Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

---

Table of Contents

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD JUNE 17, 2015

        Notice is hereby given that the 2015 annual meeting of shareholders of Oxford Industries, Inc. will be held on Wednesday, June 17, 2015 at 3:00 p.m., local time, at The Fifth Floor Conference Center at 999 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309. The purposes of the meeting are to:

(1)

Elect three directors nominated by our Board and named in the accompanying proxy statement to serve for a term of three years and until their respective successors are elected and qualified;



(2)

Approve the selection of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2015;



(3)

Hold an advisory, non-binding vote to approve executive compensation; and



(4)

Transact any other business that properly comes before the annual meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the annual meeting.

        Shareholders of record as of the close of business on April 17, 2015 will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting or at any adjournment or postponement of the annual meeting. This notice and the accompanying proxy statement are being mailed to shareholders beginning on or about May 15, 2015.

        A list of our shareholders entitled to vote at the annual meeting will be available for examination by any shareholder, or his or her agent or attorney, at the annual meeting. The enclosed proxy is solicited on behalf of our Board. Reference is made to the accompanying proxy statement for further information with respect to the items of business to be transacted at the annual meeting.

        Your vote is important. Regardless of whether you plan to attend the meeting, you are encouraged to vote as soon as possible. You may vote over the Internet, by telephone or by signing and returning the enclosed proxy card. Please review the instructions on each of your voting options described on the enclosed proxy card. You may revoke your proxy at any time before the meeting and, if you attend the meeting, you may elect to vote in person. If your shares are held in an account at a bank or broker, your bank or broker will vote your shares for you if you provide voting instructions. In the absence of instructions, your broker can only vote your shares on limited matters.

        Attendance at the meeting is limited to shareholders, those holding proxies from shareholders, and invited guests such as members of the media. If your shares are held in an account at a bank or broker, you should bring the notice or voting instruction form you received from your bank or broker, or obtain a valid proxy card from your bank or broker, in order to gain admission to the meeting.

---

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

---

Table of Contents

999 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 688
Atlanta, Georgia 30309

---

PROXY STATEMENT

---

For Annual Shareholders Meeting
To Be Held on June 17, 2015

INTRODUCTION

        This proxy statement contains information relating to the annual meeting of shareholders of Oxford Industries, Inc. to be held on Wednesday, June 17, 2015, beginning at 3:00 p.m., local time. The annual meeting will be held at The Fifth Floor Conference Center at 999 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309. You may contact our Investor Relations Department at (404) 659-2424 to obtain directions to the site of the annual meeting.

        We will begin mailing this proxy statement, the attached Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and the accompanying proxy card on or about May 15, 2015 to all holders of our common stock, par value $1.00 per share, entitled to vote at the annual meeting. Along with this proxy statement, we are also sending our Annual Report to Shareholders for fiscal 2014, which ended on January 31, 2015.

INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING AND VOTING

Shares Outstanding

        You may vote at our 2015 annual shareholders meeting if you owned shares of our common stock as of the close of business on April 17, 2015, the record date for the annual meeting. As of the record date, there were 16,575,215 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding. You are entitled to one vote for each share of our common stock that you owned on the record date.

Voting

        If, on April 17, 2015, your shares of Oxford common stock were registered directly in your name with Computershare, our transfer agent, then you are a shareholder of record. As a shareholder of record, you may vote using one of the following methods:

•

by voting over the Internet by following the instructions contained on the enclosed proxy card;



•

by voting by telephone in accordance with the instructions contained on the enclosed proxy card;



•

by signing and returning the enclosed proxy (even if the proxy does not include your voting instructions); or



•

by attending the annual meeting and voting in person.

        If you are a shareholder of record and you sign and return your proxy card but do not include voting instructions, your proxy will be voted as recommended by our Board or, if no recommendation is given, in the discretion of the proxies designated on the proxy card, to the extent permitted under applicable law.

        If you are a shareholder of record, your shares will not be voted unless you submit a proxy or attend the annual meeting and vote in person. If you vote over the Internet or by telephone, please have your proxy card available at the time you submit your voting instructions. The Internet and telephone voting procedures provided on the enclosed proxy card are designed to authenticate shareholders' identities and to confirm that their instructions have been properly recorded.

        If, on April 17, 2015, your shares were held in an account at a bank or broker, like most of our shareholders, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in "street name" and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by that

1

---

Table of Contents

organization. The bank or broker holding your account is considered the shareholder of record for purposes of voting at the annual meeting. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your bank or broker on how to vote the shares in your account. Telephone and/or Internet voting may also be available to direct your bank or broker on how to vote the shares in your account but the availability of telephone and/or Internet voting will depend on the voting processes of your bank or broker. Please follow the directions on your proxy card or voting instruction form carefully. Even if your shares are held in an account at a bank or broker, you are invited to attend the annual meeting. However, since you are not the shareholder of record, you may not vote your shares in person at the meeting unless you obtain a valid proxy card from your bank or broker and, in order to gain admission to the meeting, you should bring the notice or voting instruction form you received from your bank or broker, or obtain a valid proxy card from your bank or broker.

Broker Discretionary Voting; Broker Non-Votes

        If you hold shares through an account with a bank or broker, your shares may be voted by the bank or broker even if you do not provide voting instructions. Banks and brokerage firms have the authority, under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE"), to vote shares in their discretion on certain "routine" matters when their customers do not provide voting instructions. Under the NYSE's rules, as currently in effect, only Proposal No. 2 (approval of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2015) is considered a routine matter.

        The other proposals to be addressed at the annual meeting are considered "non-routine" matters under the NYSE's rules. When a bank or brokerage firm has not received voting instructions from the beneficial holder of the shares with respect to a non-routine matter, the bank or brokerage firm cannot vote the shares on that proposal. This is called a "broker non-vote." Broker non-votes will be counted as present at the annual meeting for quorum purposes but will not be counted as entitled to vote on the non-routine matter. Therefore, if your shares are held in an account at a bank or broker, it is important that you provide voting instructions to your bank or broker so that your vote on these proposals is counted.

Changing Your Vote

        If you are a shareholder of record, you may revoke or change your vote with respect to the shares of our common stock that are registered directly in your name by doing any of the following:

•

delivering a written notice of revocation to our Secretary before the vote is taken at the annual meeting, such notice of revocation dated later than the proxy you want to revoke;



•

prior to the applicable cutoff time, changing your vote using the Internet or telephone methods for voting described above;



•

properly executing and delivering a later-dated proxy before the vote is taken at the annual meeting; or



•

voting in person at the annual meeting (your attendance at the annual meeting, in and of itself, will not revoke the earlier proxy).

        If your shares are held in an account at a bank or broker, then you must follow the instructions provided by your bank or broker in order to revoke or change your vote with respect to those shares held in street name.

Quorum

        In order for us to conduct the annual meeting, the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock issued and outstanding as of the record date must be present, in person or by proxy, at the annual meeting. This is referred to as a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will be counted as shares present at the meeting for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS

Directors

        Under our articles of incorporation, our Board is to consist of at least nine members, with the specific number fixed by our bylaws, as amended from time to time. Currently, our bylaws have fixed the number of directors at 11.

        J. Hicks Lanier, one of our directors and our current Chairman, has reached the mandatory retirement age under our bylaws and, accordingly, is retiring from our Board at the conclusion of the annual meeting. Mr. Lanier has served as the Chairman of our Board since 1981, and also served as our Chief Executive Officer from 1981 until his retirement at the end of

2

---

Table of Contents

2012. Mr. Lanier has provided strong leadership to our company as we transformed from our historical domestic manufacturing roots into an international apparel design, sourcing and marketing company with a portfolio of owned and licensed lifestyle brands and company-owned retail operations. We thank Mr. Lanier for his many years of service to our company.

        Following Mr. Lanier's retirement, there will be a vacancy on our Board. Our Board may choose to immediately fill the vacancy, allow the vacancy to remain open until a suitable candidate is located and elected, or amend our bylaws to reduce the number of directors serving on our Board.

        Our Board has nominated the following current directors for re-election at the annual meeting: Thomas C. Chubb III; John R. Holder; and Clarence H. Smith.

        The following table sets forth, as of April 17, 2015, certain information concerning our nominees for director and our continuing directors, as well as a description of the specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led our Board to conclude that each of these individuals should serve as a director.

3

---

Table of Contents

4

---

Table of Contents

5

---

Table of Contents

6

---

Table of Contents

Director Independence

        Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that we will have a majority of "independent" directors under the NYSE's listing standards, as determined by the Board, and that, at least annually, our Nominating, Compensation & Governance Committee, or NC&G Committee, will review each relationship that exists with a director and his or her related interests for the purpose of determining whether the director is independent. Based in part on our NC&G Committee's review, our Board annually considers the independence of each of our directors, as well as upon learning about intervening events that may impact director independence.

        In March 2015, our NC&G Committee and full Board considered director independence. As part of this consideration, our NC&G Committee and full Board broadly considered all relevant facts and circumstances, including the NYSE's corporate governance listing standards and all relevant transactions and relationships between each director (and his or her immediate family and affiliates) and our company and management to determine whether any relationship might impair the director's ability to make independent judgments.

        Based on this review and consistent with the recommendation of our NC&G Committee, our Board affirmatively determined that the following nine directors are independent: Thomas C. Gallagher; George C. Guynn; John R. Holder; J. Reese Lanier; Dennis M. Love; Clarence H. Smith; Clyde C. Tuggle; Helen Ballard; and E. Jenner Wood III.

        In evaluating the independence of our directors, our Board and NC&G Committee gave particular consideration to the following relationships and transactions:

•

Mr. Thomas C. Gallagher served on our Board from 1991 until 2007, when he resigned in order to eliminate a director interlock relationship that existed based on Mr. J. Hicks Lanier's service on the Compensation Committee of Genuine Parts Company; our Chairman and previous Chief Executive Officer J. Hicks Lanier served as a member of the Board and chair of the Compensation Committee of Genuine Parts Company until his retirement from those positions in 2013; and two of our other directors, John R. Holder and E. Jenner Wood III, currently serve as directors of Genuine Parts Company, with a third member of our Board, George C. Guynn, having recently served as a director of Genuine Parts Company until his retirement from that board as of its April 2015 annual meeting;

7

---

Table of Contents

•

Mr. J. Reese Lanier beneficially owns or has the ability to direct the voting of 1.3% of our outstanding common stock; Mr. Lanier was an employee of our company more than 45 years ago; Mr. Lanier is a first cousin of Mr. J. Hicks Lanier, our Chairman and retired Chief Executive Officer; and Mr. Lanier's son served as one of our executive officers until October 2007;



•

Mr. Clyde C. Tuggle's employer, The Coca-Cola Company, is a vendor to our company, including providing products to our Tommy Bahama Group's restaurant division in the ordinary course of business; and



•

Mr. E. Jenner Wood III is employed by a subsidiary of SunTrust Banks, Inc.; during 2014, our company continued its long-standing banking relationship with SunTrust, which includes a syndicated, revolving credit facility that we maintain with SunTrust; the payments we made to SunTrust represented an immaterial percentage of the Company's and SunTrust's revenues in 2014, and Mr. Wood did not personally participate in or benefit from this relationship.

        Our Board determined that these payments and relationships were not material to a determination that the applicable directors were independent. As a result and taking into consideration, among other things, the objectivity of Messrs. Gallagher, J. Reese Lanier, Tuggle and Wood at previous meetings of our Board, our Board determined that each is independent.

        Mr. J. Hicks Lanier served as our Chief Executive Officer until his retirement at the end of 2012 and, accordingly, is not independent. Mr. Chubb is currently our Chief Executive Officer and President, and therefore not independent.

Corporate Governance Guidelines; Conduct Policies

        Our Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that set forth certain guidelines for the operation of the Board and its committees. In accordance with its charter, our NC&G Committee periodically reviews and assesses the adequacy of our Corporate Governance Guidelines. As provided under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Board annually conducts a self-evaluation. Our NC&G Committee oversees our Board's self-evaluation process. Our Board has the authority to engage its own advisors and consultants.

        Our Board has also adopted a Code of Conduct for all of our directors, officers and employees, as well as an ethical conduct policy that applies to our senior financial officers, including, among others, our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer and controller. We intend to disclose amendments to our Code of Conduct and our ethical conduct policy for our senior financial officers (other than technical, administrative or other non-substantive amendments) and material waivers of (or failure to enforce) any provisions of these conduct policies (if applicable to any of our directors or executive officers) on our Internet website at www.oxfordinc.com.

Board Meetings and Committees of our Board of Directors

        During fiscal 2014, our Board held four meetings and committees of our Board held a total of seven meetings. During fiscal 2014, each of our directors attended 100% of the meetings of our Board and of all committees of which the director was a member during the period he or she was a director or committee member.

        Although we do not have a formal policy requiring attendance by directors at our annual meetings of shareholders, as stated in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, we encourage directors to attend our annual meetings of shareholders in person. In order to facilitate attendance by our directors, we generally schedule our annual meetings of shareholders to coincide with the date of a quarterly meeting of our Board. All of our directors attended our 2014 annual meeting of shareholders.

8

---

Table of Contents

        Our Board has a standing Executive Committee, Audit Committee and NC&G Committee. The following table identifies the members of each of these committees as of May 11, 2015 and the number of official meetings held by each of these committees (and actions taken by written consent in lieu of meetings) during fiscal 2014.

Executive Committee

        Our Executive Committee has the power to exercise the authority of the full Board in managing the business and affairs of our company, except that our Executive Committee does not have certain powers that are reserved to our full Board under Georgia law. In practice, our Executive Committee serves as a means for taking action requiring our Board's approval between its regularly scheduled meetings.

Audit Committee

        Our Audit Committee was established in accordance with the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (which we refer to as the "SEC") to assist our Board in fulfilling its responsibilities with respect to oversight of the following: (1) the integrity of our financial statements, reporting processes and systems of internal controls; (2) our compliance with applicable laws and regulations; (3) the qualifications and independence of our independent registered public accounting firm; and (4) the performance of our internal audit department and our independent registered public accounting firm.

        The principal duties and responsibilities of our Audit Committee are set forth in its charter. Pursuant to its charter, our Audit Committee has the express authority to retain, at our company's expense, any outside legal, accounting or other advisors that it deems necessary or helpful to the performance of its responsibilities. Our Audit Committee may exercise additional authority prescribed from time to time by our Board.

        Our Board annually evaluates the financial expertise and independence of the members of our Audit Committee. Following its review in March 2015, our Board determined that each of Mr. Guynn and Mr. Holder is an "audit committee financial expert," as that term is defined by SEC rules and regulations, and all of the members of our Audit Committee are financially literate in accordance with the NYSE's governance listing standards and SEC rules and regulations.

Nominating, Compensation & Governance Committee (or NC&G Committee)

        The purpose of our NC&G Committee is to: (1) assist our Board in fulfilling its responsibilities with respect to the compensation of our executive officers; (2) recommend candidates for all directorships to be filled; (3) identify individuals qualified to serve as members of our Board; (4) review and recommend committee appointments; (5) take a leadership role in shaping our corporate governance; (6) develop and recommend to our Board for adoption our Corporate Governance Guidelines; (7) lead our Board in an annual review of its own performance; and (8) perform other functions that it deems necessary or appropriate. Our Board has determined that all members of our NC&G Committee are independent in accordance with the NYSE's corporate governance listing standards. Pursuant to its charter, our NC&G Committee has the

9

---

Table of Contents

express authority to retain or obtain the advice of a compensation consultant, independent legal counsel or other advisor, at our company's expense.

        Our NC&G Committee also has the following responsibilities, among others, related to compensation matters: (1) administering our stock option and restricted stock plans; (2) administering our Executive Performance Incentive Plan, or "EPIP"; (3) reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, evaluating our Chief Executive Officer's performance in light of those goals and objectives and determining the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer based upon this evaluation; (4) reviewing and approving the compensation of our non-CEO executive officers; and (5) making recommendations to our Board regarding certain incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans. In addition, as part of its oversight of our overall compensation program, our NC&G Committee considers our compensation policies and procedures, including the incentives that they create and factors that may influence excessive risk taking.

        In light of NYSE rules, our Board evaluated the independence of the members of our NC&G Committee. Following its review in March 2015, our Board determined that all of the members of our NC&G Committee meet the enhanced independence standards applicable to compensation committee members in accordance with the NYSE's corporate governance listing standards.

        For information about the role of executive officers and compensation consultants in determining compensation, see "Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis" below.

Meetings of Non-Employee Directors

        Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our non-employee directors periodically meet separately in executive sessions. Mr. Wood, as our presiding independent director, chaired the meetings of our non-employee directors during fiscal 2014.

Board Leadership

        Our Board is responsible for governing the affairs of our company effectively for the benefit of our shareholders. In discharging this responsibility, our Board relies on the judgment, business acumen, and experience of our qualified management team. Our directors believe that the appropriate leadership structure for our Board may change from time to time. As stated in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Board does not have a policy as to whether our Chief Executive Officer should also serve as chair of our Board. The Board makes this decision as it deems appropriate from time to time based upon the relevant factors applicable to each case. At least annually, the Board deliberates on and discusses the appropriate leadership structure for our Board based on the needs of our company.

Current Leadership Structure

        Our Board is currently comprised of nine independent directors; one non-independent, non-management director (our retired Chief Executive Officer, Mr. J. Hicks Lanier); and one management director (our current Chief Executive Officer and President, Mr. Chubb). Until his retirement as our Chief Executive Officer in December 2012, Mr. J. Hicks Lanier served in the dual capacity of Chief Executive Officer and chair of our Board. Based upon his insights into the day-to-day operations of our business and his long tenure on our Board and the continuity that his experience offered, we believed that our company and shareholders were best served by having Mr. Lanier serve in both capacities.

        At the time of Mr. Lanier's retirement from his position as our Chief Executive Officer in December 2012, we separated the roles of chair of our Board (Mr. Lanier) and Chief Executive Officer (Mr. Chubb). At that time, our Board considered the myriad factors relevant to establishing an effective leadership structure. Based upon these considerations, including Mr. Lanier's distinct qualifications to provide advice to, and oversight of, management, our Board believed that Mr. Lanier's continued service as the chair of our Board was appropriate, with Mr. Chubb, in his capacity as our Chief Executive Officer, focusing on the daily operations of our business, the activities of our operating groups, our business objectives and other factors impacting our business.

        We also have a presiding independent director (Mr. E. Jenner Wood III). In his capacity as the presiding independent director, Mr. Wood sets the agenda for, and chairs, executive sessions of our non-employee directors; serves as a liaison between independent directors and our Chairman and our Chief Executive Officer; and serves as a liaison between our shareholders and our independent directors. As presiding independent director, Mr. Wood is in regular contact with our

10

---

Table of Contents

Chairman and our Chief Executive Officer about our operating results and activities, risks to our business and business prospects.

        Our Board believes this structure has served us well since Mr. Lanier's retirement as Chief Executive Officer.

Change to Leadership Structure in June 2015

        Mr. Lanier is retiring from our Board at the conclusion of the 2015 annual meeting, as he has reached the retirement age set forth in our bylaws. In anticipation of Mr. Lanier's eventual retirement, our Board deliberated extensively over several months about the most appropriate leadership structure for the future. Our Board currently expects that Mr. Chubb, our Chief Executive Officer and President, will be elected to also serve as the chair of our Board following Mr. Lanier's retirement. Our Board also expects that Mr. Wood will continue in his role as our presiding independent director.

        In making its decision, our Board considered Mr. Chubb's leadership qualities, management capability, knowledge of the business and industry, the long-term, strategic perspective he has demonstrated over the course of many years, his performance as our Chief Executive Officer and his demonstrated focus on growing long-term shareholder value. The Board also noted that we have, in Mr. Wood, an active, engaged presiding independent director. We also have a supermajority of independent directors, regular meetings of our non-employee directors in executive session, and an Audit Committee and NC&G Committee (each of which reports to our full Board on a quarterly basis on significant committee activities) comprised solely of independent directors.

        The Board recognizes that there is a variety of viewpoints concerning a board's optimal leadership structure, and considered all viewpoints in making its decision, including considerations around trends in board practices, statistical analyses on financial performance of companies with varying board leadership structures, the speed with which a combined Chair/CEO can identify company concerns and communicate this information to the other members of a board, and the ability of a combined Chair/CEO to provide superior information to the other members of a board given insights into the day-to-day issues faced by a company. Our Board also considered the historical Board leadership structure at our company and the current composition of our Board, as well as our management team, business and performance.

        Based on the extensive review and consideration by our Board, our Board believes a leadership structure comprised of an executive chair and CEO, balanced with a strong lead independent director role tasked with significant specified duties, is in the best interests of our company and shareholders as we move forward beyond the 2015 annual meeting.

Board's Role in Risk Oversight

        Our Board is ultimately charged with overseeing our business, including risks to our business, on behalf of our shareholders. In order to fulfill this responsibility, our Audit Committee, pursuant to its charter, reviews our policies with respect to our company's risk assessment and risk management. At our Audit Committee's direction and with its oversight, we conduct an enterprise risk management program (which we refer to as the "ERM program") on an ongoing basis. At each quarterly meeting of our Audit Committee, a significant portion of time is devoted to a management report to the committee on the status of the ERM program and/or particular risks faced by our company. Our Audit Committee actively engages management on potential strategies for reducing, eliminating or mitigating the risks to our organization. Our Audit Committee regularly reports to our Board on our ERM program, and our management at least annually provides our Board with a full report on our ERM program. In addition to our ERM program, our Board examines specific business risks in its regular reviews of our operating groups and also on a company-wide basis as part of its regular strategic reviews.

        As part of its oversight of our overall compensation program, our NC&G Committee considers our compensation policies and procedures, including the incentives that they create and factors that may influence excessive risk taking. In particular, our compensation program provides for short-term cash incentive payments to individuals throughout our company based on satisfaction of pre-established performance targets. For employees within our various operating groups, these performance targets may be based on performance by the operating group, as a whole, or a specific business unit or business location within that operating group. Each cash incentive award for an individual employee within our organization is subject to a maximum amount payable to the individual. Our senior management and, with respect to our executive officers, our compensation committee, approve applicable performance targets taking into consideration our detailed, internal budgets for upcoming fiscal periods. These members of senior management have access to daily retail sales data and receive monthly financial reports, and they review and analyze deviations from the budgeted plans to assess whether, among other things, the deviations were the result of inappropriate risk taking. We have concluded that our compensation policies and procedures are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our company.

11

---

Table of Contents

Website Information

        We have posted our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Code of Conduct, our ethical conduct policy for our senior financial officers, our Audit Committee charter and our NC&G Committee charter under the "Corporate Governance" link under the "Investor Relations" tab on our Internet website at www.oxfordinc.com.

Director Nomination Process

        In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our NC&G Committee periodically reviews the skills and characteristics required of our directors in the context of the make-up of our Board. This assessment includes issues such as independence, expertise, age, diversity, general business knowledge and experience, financial literacy, availability and commitment, and other criteria that our NC&G Committee finds to be relevant.

        Consistent with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our NC&G Committee recognizes that a diversity of viewpoints and practical experiences can enhance our Board's effectiveness. Accordingly, it is the practice of our NC&G Committee in evaluating the diversity of potential director candidates to give particular consideration to the diverse experiences and perspectives that a prospective candidate may bring to our Board. In order to accomplish its objectives, our NC&G Committee's evaluations of potential candidates generally involve a review of the candidate's background and credentials, interviews of a candidate by members of our Board, and discussions among our directors. Based on its evaluation in light of the foregoing factors, our NC&G Committee recommends candidates to our full Board which, in turn, selects candidates to be nominated for election by the shareholders or to be elected by our Board to fill a vacancy.

Director Compensation

Compensation Program for Fiscal 2014

        During fiscal 2014, our non-employee directors received compensation in accordance with the following program guidelines:

•

an annual stock retainer in the form of restricted stock (subject to a vesting period generally coinciding with one year of service on our Board) granted to each non-employee director with a grant date fair value of $50,000;



•

an annual cash retainer of $30,000 payable in quarterly installments to each non-employee director;



•

an additional $12,500 annual cash retainer payable in quarterly installments to the chairs of our Audit Committee and our NC&G Committee; and



•

a $1,250 meeting fee for each committee or board meeting attended.

        To further encourage our directors to enhance their ownership of our stock, our non-employee directors are given the option to elect to receive the $30,000 annual cash retainer in the form of a one-time restricted stock grant having a grant date fair value of $30,000. For fiscal 2014, two of our non-employee directors elected to receive the $30,000 annual cash retainer in the form of restricted stock.

        Director compensation is paid for the 12-month period commencing with each annual meeting of shareholders. The number of shares of our restricted stock to be issued in respect of each non-employee director's annual stock retainer (and in respect of the annual cash retainer, if a director elected to receive that portion of his retainer in the form of stock) was based on the closing price of our common stock as reported on the NYSE as of the grant date for the restricted stock.

        Under our deferred compensation plan, our non-employee directors are eligible to defer receipt of up to 100% of their cash retainers and/or board and committee meeting fees. Non-employee directors are permitted to "invest" their deferred fees among a platform of investment options that are available to our eligible employees who participate in the plan. Our deferred compensation plan is an unfunded, non-qualified deferred compensation plan, and participants' account balances are subject to the claims of our company's creditors. In the event that our company becomes insolvent, participants in the plan would be unsecured general creditors with respect to their account balances, which we believe further aligns the interests of our participating directors with the long-term interests of our shareholders. Two of our non-employee directors participated in our deferred compensation plan during fiscal 2014.

        Employee directors do not receive an annual retainer or meeting fees for their service on our Board.

12

---

Table of Contents

Director Compensation for Fiscal 2014

        The table below summarizes the compensation for our non-employee directors for fiscal 2014.

13

---

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

        All of our executive officers are elected by and serve at the discretion of our Board. The following table sets forth information about our executive officers as of April 17, 2015:

14

---

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Introduction

        In this section of the proxy statement, we provide information about our executive compensation program specifically as it relates to our "named executive officers," or NEOs. This information includes: (1) a Compensation Discussion and Analysis discussing, among other things, how and why our NC&G Committee (which we refer to in this section of the proxy statement as our "compensation committee") made its fiscal 2014 compensation decisions for our NEOs; (2) the compensation tables required by the SEC's rules and regulations; and (3) a summary of certain limited arrangements with our NEOs that provide for payments upon defined change of control events or upon termination of employment.

        For fiscal 2014, our NEOs are as follows:

•

Mr. Thomas C. Chubb III, our Chief Executive Officer and President;



•

Mr. K. Scott Grassmyer, our Executive Vice President-Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Controller;



•

Mr. Scott A. Beaumont, CEO, Lilly Pulitzer Group;



•

Mr. Thomas E. Campbell, our Executive Vice President-Law and Administration, General Counsel and Secretary; and



•

Mr. Terry R. Pillow, CEO, Tommy Bahama Group.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Executive Summary

        We are a global apparel company that designs, sources, markets and distributes products bearing the trademarks of our company-owned lifestyle brands, as well as certain licensed and private label apparel products. Our portfolio of owned brands includes Tommy Bahama®, Lilly Pulitzer® and Ben Sherman®. We distribute our company-owned lifestyle branded products through our direct to consumer channel, consisting of our retail stores and e-commerce sites and Tommy Bahama restaurants in select locations, and our wholesale distribution channel, which includes better department stores and specialty stores. During fiscal 2014, 90% of our net sales were from products bearing brands that we own, and 61% of our net sales were sales of our products through our direct to consumer channels of distribution.

        Our business strategy is to develop and market compelling lifestyle brands and products that evoke a strong, emotional response from our target consumers. We consider "lifestyle" brands to be brands that have a clearly defined and targeted point of view inspired by an appealing lifestyle or attitude, such as the Tommy Bahama, Lilly Pulitzer and Ben Sherman brands. In executing our objectives, we strive to develop businesses that can drive sustained profitable growth and enhance long-term shareholder value.

        Fiscal 2014 was another good year for us, with a mid-single digits percentage increase in our adjusted earnings per share, driven by higher operating income in our Lilly Pulitzer Group and improved operating results in our Ben Sherman Group. During the year, we continued to invest in our key lifestyle brands, which put downward pressure on our margins, and had strong full-year performances from both Tommy Bahama and Lilly Pulitzer.

•

For fiscal 2014, consolidated net sales rose 9% to $997.8 million from $917.1 million in fiscal 2013.



•

In fiscal 2014, Tommy Bahama's net sales increased 7% to $627.5 million, reflecting increases in all channels of distribution and a comparable store sales increase of 4%, which we believe is noteworthy in light of recent conditions in our industry.



•

In fiscal 2014, net sales at Lilly Pulitzer increased 22% from the prior year to $167.7 million reflecting increases in all channels of distribution and a remarkable comparable store sales increase of 19%.



•

In fiscal 2014, net sales for Ben Sherman increased to $77.5 million due to strength in our direct to consumer operations, resulting in a more than $2 million reduction in operating loss for the year. Our Ben Sherman operating group concluded fiscal 2014 on an improved trajectory, and with the aim of achieving long-term value for our shareholders, on March 26, 2015, we announced that we have initiated a process to sell the Ben Sherman business.

        For our shareholders, we achieved a total shareholder return over the last three years of 18%. While our stock price at the end of fiscal 2014 was less than it was at the end of fiscal 2013, we have started 2015 well. Our stock price has risen 40%

15

---

Table of Contents

during the first part of fiscal 2015, increasing from $55.94 per share on January 30, 2015, the last trading day of fiscal 2014, to $78.11 per share on May 1, 2015, the last trading day of our fiscal 2015 first quarter.

Consideration of Last Year's Advisory Shareholder Vote on NEO Compensation

        At our 2014 annual meeting of shareholders, we held an advisory vote seeking shareholder approval of a "say-on-pay" proposal approving our NEO compensation program. At the 2014 annual meeting, approximately 99% of the votes cast on our say-on-pay proposal were cast in support of our NEO compensation program, as described in our 2014 proxy statement. In light of the extraordinary shareholder support on last year's say-on-pay proposal, our compensation committee has continued to apply the same principles and general compensation programs for fiscal 2014. However, our compensation committee regularly evaluates market compensation practices, taking into consideration information relating to compensation paid by peers and information furnished by management and compensation consultants, and implements changes as it deems appropriate.

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

        Our executive compensation programs are designed to:

•

maintain a strong link between pay and performance;



•

align our executive officers' interests with those of our shareholders; and



•

ensure that we are able to attract and retain talented individuals.

        Consistent with these objectives, our NEO compensation practices incorporate the following in consideration of the long-term best interests of our shareholders:

•

we tie a significant percentage of each NEO's potential cash and total compensation opportunities to performance of our company and/or our operating groups;



•

we do not provide our NEOs with tax gross-ups;



•

our equity compensation awards are subject to a "double trigger" acceleration of vesting;



•

in 2015, we adopted a stand-alone recoupment, or "clawback," policy pursuant to which we may seek to recover incentive-based compensation, defined broadly to include performance-based grants of cash or equity, from any current or former executive officer who received incentive-based compensation during the three-year period preceding the date on which we announce that we are required to restate any previously issued financial statements due to material non-compliance with any financial reporting requirement under federal securities laws;



•

we do not pay dividends or dividend equivalents on performance-based equity compensation awards during the applicable performance period;



•

repricing of stock options is prohibited under our Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (which we refer to as the "LTIP") absent shareholder approval;



•

we maintain stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers;



•

we have a retention guideline, or holding period, on exercised stock options and vested restricted stock that applies to our executive officers;



•

we have an anti-hedging policy prohibiting our directors and executive officers from hedging the economic risk of ownership of our company's stock;



•

we have a formal anti-pledging restriction applicable to our directors and executive officers; and



•

we provide only modest perquisites, namely complimentary or discounted availability of our products, that serve the best interests of our business and are common practice in our industry.

Compensation Decision Process

        Compensation Committee; Compensation Consultants.    Pursuant to its charter, our compensation committee has the authority, with our company's funding, to retain or obtain the advice of a compensation consultant to assist in the evaluation

16

---

Table of Contents

of, among other things, chief executive officer and non-CEO executive officer compensation, provided, that it will retain such an advisor only after taking into consideration relevant factors relating to the advisor's independence from our management.

        During fiscal 2014, our compensation committee again retained Mercer (US) Inc. ("Mercer") as its compensation consultant to assist with various executive compensation matters, including proposals for the total compensation paid to our executive officers, and the individual components of executive officer compensation, and market data, including the peer group, used by management in reviewing executive officer compensation and influencing our Chief Executive Officer's recommendations to the compensation committee on compensation paid to our other NEOs for fiscal 2014.

        In relation to our compensation committee's retention of Mercer (US) Inc., our compensation committee considered various factors relating to the advisor's independence from our management, including those enumerated by the NYSE. As part of its evaluation, our compensation committee considered the following: Mercer's parent company provides certain insurance brokerage services to our company; the fees paid to Mercer's parent company in connection with those brokerage services represented a nominal amount of the revenues generated by that entity; Mercer's policies and procedures relating to conflicts of interest; the fact that the Mercer consultants that work with our company do not presently own any of our common stock; and certain present and historic business relationships between Mercer or its affiliates, on the one hand, and employers of certain of our compensation committee members. Following its review, our compensation committee concluded that Mercer was independent and that the engagement of Mercer did not raise a conflict of interest.

        In addition, during fiscal 2013, our company's management retained Towers Watson to evaluate the short-term cash incentive programs throughout our company. Although the engagement was not focused on or specific to executive compensation, certain observations and recommendations by Towers Watson influenced certain management recommendations to, and decisions by, our compensation committee in respect of fiscal 2014.

17

---

Table of Contents

        Key Participant Roles.    The following table summarizes the significant roles of the various key participants, including those of certain of our executive officers, in the decision-making process with respect to NEO compensation, in particular for fiscal 2014:

18

---

Table of Contents

        Market Data.    We utilize market surveys to obtain a general understanding of compensation practices and trends, and in evaluating market comparisons of compensation paid to our NEOs, when making compensation recommendations and decisions for our NEOs. For fiscal 2014 compensation reviews, we utilized the applicable Kenexa Global Consumer Goods Surveys; Mercer's Apparel and Retail Industry Surveys; and Towers Watson's General and Retail/Wholesale Top Management Industry Survey Reports on Executive Compensation. We do not have any input into the companies that make up these surveys.

        In addition, our compensation committee reviews compensation data obtained from publicly available sources for peer, or comparator, companies. For fiscal 2014, our compensation committee reviewed relevant compensation data from the following companies:

19

---

Table of Contents

Elements of Executive Officer Compensation

        Total compensation for our NEOs in recent years has consisted of the following components:

        Target Compensation Levels / Mix.    In recent years, our compensation committee has generally utilized the median of total cash compensation (base salary and cash incentive awards) for similar positions identified using industry and general market data, as well as that of similarly situated executives at the peer company group, as a guideline for evaluating and approving the target total cash compensation for our executive officers generally. In establishing specific base salary amounts and cash incentive award target amounts payable to any individual executive officer, our compensation committee takes into consideration a number of factors, such as the specific individual's duration with our company and in a specific role, prior performance and accomplishment of significant business strategies, the size of an operating group or business unit, the oversight and other responsibilities of the individual, the individual's prior employment experience and compensation history, other factors related to the scope or unique nature of the incumbent's job responsibilities, retention considerations, and geographic distinctions. The total target cash compensation approved by our compensation committee for our Chief Executive Officer for fiscal 2014 was below the median of industry and general market data studied by our compensation committee.

        In approving the amount of long-term equity compensation granted to our executive officers, our compensation committee reviews market data to understand trends and general compensation practices (for example, typical vesting

20

---

Table of Contents

periods and/or types and values of equity grants). In approving our fiscal 2014 equity compensation program, which is described under "—Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation," our compensation committee also took into consideration market survey data on equity compensation ranges and recommendations made by the compensation consultant engaged by our compensation committee.

        Our compensation committee reviews all components of the compensation payable to our executive officers, including base salaries, cash incentive awards, and long-term equity compensation. In approving the total target compensation of our NEOs, our compensation committee does not expressly allocate a specified percentage of total compensation to base salary, short-term incentive compensation and/or long-term equity compensation.

        Compensation Mix.    Our compensation committee generally increases target incentive award levels for an executive officer as such officer's responsibilities within our organization increase, thereby more heavily weighting the variable elements of compensation for our most senior executive officers who are more likely to have a strong and direct impact in achieving strategic and financial goals that are most likely to affect shareholder value. Our compensation committee believes that the best interests of our shareholders are served by tying pay to performance and subjecting a meaningful proportion of our NEOs' total compensation to the achievement of company and/or operating group performance that represents meaningful value to our company. As illustrated below, a significant portion of our NEOs total target direct compensation for fiscal 2014 was performance based and/or is aligned with the interests of our shareholders.

Base Salary

        Our compensation committee utilizes base salaries to provide a fixed amount of compensation to our NEOs for the performance of their duties. Base salaries of our NEOs are reviewed on an annual basis. Our compensation committee determines the salary of our Chief Executive Officer and reviews and approves (with or without modification) our Chief Executive Officer's recommended salaries for our other executive officers.

Base Salaries for Fiscal 2014

        Chief Executive Officer's Review.    In March 2014, our compensation committee evaluated Mr. Chubb's performance during fiscal 2013, which was his first full year as our Chief Executive Officer. As part of its review, our compensation committee considered the company's performance and achievements during fiscal 2013, including:

•

consolidated net sales growth of 7%, operating income growth of 8% and earnings per share growth of 8%, reflecting strong comparable store sales results and strong performances by our Tommy Bahama and Lilly Pulitzer operating groups;



•

total shareholder return of 54% during fiscal 2013;



•

top-line growth of 11% and 13% for Tommy Bahama and Lilly Pulitzer, respectively;



•

continued solid performance at Lanier Clothes, where sales and operating income exceeded budget; and



•

various continued challenges by our Ben Sherman operating group, though the second half of the year had considerable year-over-year improvement on the bottom line.

21

---

Table of Contents

Base Salaries for our NEOs.

        Following a review of relevant market data with respect to each of our NEOs, individual performance and contributions to our company and the financial performance of our company and various business units, our compensation committee approved the following merit-based increases in base salary (effective April 2014):

Short-Term Incentive Compensation

        Our compensation committee utilizes cash incentive awards under the EPIP to provide our NEOs with variable cash compensation opportunities based on company and/or operating group performance.

        For fiscal 2014, our compensation committee approved an annual cash incentive program for our NEOs. The program set target awards and performance goals based exclusively on the performance of our company or applicable operating group during the year. The fiscal 2014 program was generally similar in structure and operation to the program established in recent years except that, taking into consideration the recommendation of its compensation consultant and our company's compensation consultant, the compensation committee approved a broader range for threshold and maximum targets and payouts to better reward strong performance achievement of performance goals.

        Consistent with the objective of motivating our NEOs to achieve and exceed performance goals, our compensation committee approved target and maximum award levels expressed as a percentage of each NEO's base salary for fiscal 2014, as follows:

        For cash incentive awards that could become payable to Mr. Chubb, Mr. Grassmyer and/or Mr. Campbell, our compensation committee approved individual performance measures based on profit before taxes, as adjusted for specifically identified non-recurring or unusual items (PBT), of our company and/or each of our operating groups. The total cash incentive award for each of these individuals was comprised of distinct performance measure components tied to our company as a whole, as well as each of our operating groups individually. PBT is a performance measure which we believe drives shareholder value by focusing management on the profitability of our company and/or operating groups, taking into consideration the cost of the capital being deployed.

        For cash incentive awards that could become payable to Mr. Beaumont, the incentive award was based entirely on our Lilly Pulitzer's satisfaction of applicable PBT targets. For cash incentive awards that could become payable to Mr. Pillow, the incentive award was based entirely on Tommy Bahama Group's satisfaction of applicable PBT targets. For each of these individuals, no cash incentive would be payable under the EPIP unless the applicable threshold performance measure for the applicable operating group was satisfied.

        In establishing performance targets for cash incentive award opportunities for each of our NEOs for fiscal 2014, our compensation committee took into consideration our original budgeted plans for the fiscal year and anticipated changes in our business(es) from the prior year.

•

For purposes of the cash incentive award for Mr. Chubb, Mr. Grassmyer and Mr. Campbell, the table below sets forth the threshold, target and maximum performance targets established by our compensation committee for each of our

22

---

Table of Contents

operating groups and our company as a whole; the actual performance of each of our operating groups and our company as a whole during fiscal 2014; the applicable weighting allocated to each of our operating groups and our company as a whole; and the weighted contribution to the actual incentive award earned by each of these executive officers.

•

For purposes of the cash incentive awards to Mr. Beaumont and Mr. Pillow, the table below includes the threshold, target and maximum performance targets established by our compensation committee for our Lilly Pulitzer Group and Tommy Bahama Group, respectively, and the actual performance of each of those operating groups during fiscal 2014.

        The target PBT for each group and for total company were generally in line with our budget for fiscal 2014, except the component performance targets for Lanier Clothes and Ben Sherman were set higher than our budgeted plan, emphasizing for the heads of those operating groups the necessity to exceed our own plans in order to receive a target level incentive award. In addition, in furtherance of our objective to drive sustained, profitable growth within our organization, our total company, Tommy Bahama and Lilly Pulitzer target performance goals were set at levels requiring mid-single digit PBT percentage improvement from the actual fiscal 2013 results, and our Ben Sherman target goal required significant reductions in operating losses than were experienced during fiscal 2013.

        Based on our fiscal 2014 performance, each of our NEOs earned the following cash incentives in respect of fiscal 2014:

        Although our compensation committee retains "downward discretion" to reduce (but not to increase) the total cash incentive awards payable to any of our NEOs, it did not exercise its discretion for fiscal 2014.

Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation

        Our compensation committee utilizes stock-based incentive awards under the LTIP to incent our NEOs to remain with our company and further align the interests of our NEOs with those of our shareholders. In March 2014, our compensation committee approved the equity compensation program for fiscal 2014.

        For fiscal 2014, the program included two equity elements:

•

performance-based restricted stock awards under the LTIP that provided participants the opportunity to earn restricted shares contingent upon our achievement of certain earnings per share performance goals for our company during fiscal 2014. Any restricted shares earned by recipients would be further subject to a two year vesting period, with the shares subject to cliff vesting on April 14, 2017.



•

service-based restricted shares under the LTIP that are subject to a three year vesting period, with the awards cliff vesting on April 14, 2017.

23

---

Table of Contents

        The table below sets forth the awards approved by our compensation committee for each participating NEO for the fiscal 2014 LTIP program.

        The 2014 earnings per share performance goals established by the compensation committee for the performance-based restricted shares were as follows: threshold—$2.64; target—$3.10; and maximum—$3.56. Our actual fiscal 2014 earnings per share, as defined under the program, was $3.12. The earnings per share for our performance-based restricted stock awards differs from the adjusted earnings per share that we report in our earnings releases based on the earnings per share definition established by the compensation committee in connection with approving the performance goals and awards under the fiscal 2014 LTIP program.

        As a result of our performance, 103.3% of the target performance-based restricted shares for fiscal 2014 were earned. From the actual grant of earned restricted shares in March 2015 through the applicable vesting date, our participating NEOs receive dividends on these restricted shares and are entitled to voting rights. The fiscal 2014 equity awards would generally be forfeited if the recipient is not continuously employed by us through April 14, 2017. Accelerated vesting of the award is limited to a "double trigger" scenario (i.e., a change of control of our company and a termination of employment by the individual with good reason or by us or our acquirer without cause). In addition, amounts received or that may be received under the fiscal 2014 equity compensation program that are performance-based are subject to a clawback provision in the event of certain material restatements of our financial statements.

Other Special Incentives

        In order to further encourage the retention of Mr. Beaumont, CEO of our Lilly Pulitzer Group, who served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Sugartown Worldwide, Inc. since co-founding the company in 1993 through our acquisition of Sugartown in December 2010, our compensation committee approved two special cash long-term incentive opportunities for him during fiscal 2014.

        Specifically, the compensation committee approved a cash long-term incentive compensation award based on Lilly Pulitzer's cumulative PBT performance over a seven-quarter performance period from the second quarter of fiscal 2014 through the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015. At the end of the performance period, Mr. Beaumont would be entitled to a one-time payout of $1 million at target PBT performance over the performance period (with a prorated award between threshold and target performance and an increased award for exceeding target performance), with a target PBT goal which we consider to be robust. In addition, our compensation committee approved a special succession preparation award that would be payable in April 2016 upon the implementation of a succession planning and transition program for Lilly Pulitzer pursuant to certain parameters established by the compensation committee. If the compensation committee, taking into consideration the feedback and evaluation of our Chief Executive Officer, determines that Mr. Beaumont has successfully implemented the program and satisfied the requisite parameters under the program, Mr. Beaumont would be entitled to a one-time payout of $750,000.

        In order to receive any of the payouts described above, Mr. Beaumont must remain actively employed by us through April 1, 2016. Our compensation committee believed these award opportunities were appropriate as an effective retention incentive that took into consideration the conclusion of Mr. Beaumont's employment and earnout agreements during fiscal 2014 (both of which were entered into in connection with our 2010 acquisition of Sugartown) and in order to ensure a smooth transition with any future management succession.

        In light of these opportunities, Mr. Beaumont did not participate in our long-term equity compensation program in respect of fiscal 2014.

Other Benefit Plans and Perquisites

        Retirement Savings Plan.    During fiscal 2014, we provided retirement benefits to our eligible employees, including the NEOs, under the terms of our tax-qualified retirement savings plan (which we also refer to as our "401(k) plan"). Our 401(k)

24

---

Table of Contents

plan is intended to promote retirement savings by providing employees with an opportunity to save in a tax-efficient manner. During calendar year 2014, we made matching contributions to participants who had achieved a minimum of one year of service under the plan of (1) 100% of the first 3% of the participant's compensation that is deferred and (2) 50% of the next 2% of the participant's compensation that was deferred.

        Our company contributions under the 401(k) plan are subject to limitations prescribed by the Internal Revenue Code. Our company contributions to the 401(k) plan vest immediately. Our NEOs are permitted to make contributions to the plan solely from pre-tax compensation. Our NEOs participate in our 401(k) plan on the same terms as other "highly compensated employees" (determined under applicable Internal Revenue Service guidelines) of our company. During fiscal 2014, Messrs. Chubb, Grassmyer, Beaumont and Campbell participated in our 401(k) plan. Company contributions for each NEO during fiscal 2014 under our 401(k) plan are included in the table below under "—Compensation Tables—Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal 2014."

        Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan.    We offer a Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan, which we refer to as the "Deferred Compensation Plan," to certain highly compensated employees based in the United States, including the NEOs (other than Mr. Beaumont, who is an employee of our Lilly Pulitzer Group, which does not currently participate in our Deferred Compensation Plan). Under the Deferred Compensation Plan, a participant may defer up to 50% of base salary and up to 100% of an annual performance-based cash incentive award. The eligible NEOs participate in the Deferred Compensation Plan on the same terms as our other eligible, participating employees. During fiscal 2014, Messrs. Chubb, Grassmyer, Campbell and Pillow participated in the Deferred Compensation Plan.

        All deferral elections are irrevocable except in the case of a hardship. In respect of calendar year 2014, we made a contribution to each participant's account of (1) 4% of the amount that a participant's compensation during the calendar year exceeded the 401(k) compensation limit for the calendar year (which for calendar year 2014 was $260,000), and (2) 4% of any compensation that is excluded from receiving a company match in the 401(k) plan due to participation in the Deferred Compensation Plan, provided in each case that the participant elects under the Deferred Compensation Plan to defer at least 1% of his or her base salary following enrollment in the Deferred Compensation Plan. Company contributions for each NEO during fiscal 2014 under our Deferred Compensation Plan are included in the table below under "—Compensation Tables—Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal 2014."

        The Deferred Compensation Plan is intended to offer our highly compensated employees, including our eligible NEOs, a tax-efficient method for accumulating retirement savings, as well as to provide an opportunity for our executives to accumulate savings in a tax-efficient manner for significant expenses while continuing in service. The Deferred Compensation Plan constitutes an unfunded, non-qualified deferred compensation plan, and participants' account balances are subject to the claims of our company's creditors. In the event that our company becomes insolvent, participants in the Deferred Compensation Plan would be unsecured general creditors with respect to their account balances, which we believe further aligns the interests of our participating NEOs with the long-term interests of our shareholders.

        Because none of our NEOs received above-market, fixed rates of return under the Deferred Compensation Plan, earnings under the plan are not included in the table below under "—Compensation Tables—Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal 2014." Earnings and related activity under the Deferred Compensation Plan by our NEOs during fiscal 2014 are described below under "—Compensation Tables—Fiscal 2014 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation."

        Executive Medical Insurance Plan.    Certain key employees, including Messrs. Chubb, Grassmyer and Campbell, are eligible to receive reimbursement of qualified medical expenses in an amount up to $100,000 per year with a limit of $10,000 per occurrence. Our executive medical insurance plan reimburses eligible executives for reasonable, medically necessary expenses that are not covered under a base medical plan. Our executive medical insurance also provides for a $100,000 accidental death and dismemberment benefit that will pay an eligible executive officer's beneficiary the lump sum amount in the event of death as a result of a covered accident. In addition, pursuant to the terms of Mr. Beaumont's employment agreement when we acquired the Lilly Pulitzer brand and operations in 2010, we agreed to pay the health, dental, life and long-term disability insurance premiums for Mr. Beaumont and his dependents on his behalf.

        Company contributions for each NEO during fiscal 2014 under our executive medical insurance plan and the payment of premiums for Mr. Beaumont and his dependents are included in the table below under "—Compensation Tables—Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal 2014."

        Other Benefits.    In addition to some of the other compensation policies discussed above, our NEOs are generally eligible to participate in and receive the same health, life insurance and disability benefits, and to participate in certain other benefit

25

---

Table of Contents

plans such as our employee stock purchase plan, available to our employees generally, subject to distinctions in our plans that are applicable to employees of our subsidiaries and/or are based on residence requirements.

        Merchandise Discounts.    From time to time, our NEOs receive discounts on merchandise purchased directly from our distribution centers or through our direct to consumer channels, as well as complimentary meals at our Tommy Bahama restaurants. Certain of these discounts and benefits are offered to other designated employees from time to time. We offer these discounts and benefits because they represent common practice in our industry.

Written Arrangements

        Subject to the effect of local labor laws, all of our employees are terminable at our discretion. From time to time, we have entered into written employment arrangements with certain of our employees, including certain of our executive officers. In addition, we have from time to time implemented discretionary separation programs that have provided for separation payments to departing employees. We do not currently have a written employment agreement with any of our NEOs. However, certain of the terms of Mr. Beaumont's employment with our Lilly Pulitzer Group, such as our payment of the health, dental, life and long-term disability insurance premiums for Mr. Beaumont and his dependents, continues consistent with the terms of an employment agreement we entered into with Mr. Beaumont in connection with our acquisition of the Lilly Pulitzer brand and operations in December 2010. The term of that employment agreement expired on January 31, 2015.

Clawback Policy

        In March 2015 we adopted a recoupment, or "clawback," policy in order to further align the interests of our executive officers with the interests of our shareholders and strengthen the link between total compensation and our performance. Under this policy, we may seek to recover incentive-based compensation from any current or former executive officer who received incentive-based compensation during the three-year period preceding the date on which we announce that we are required to restate any previously issued financial statements due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under federal securities laws.

        Under the policy, the amount to be recovered will be determined by the compensation committee taking into account such considerations as it deems appropriate, including the overpayment relative to the incentive based-compensation that would have been paid to the employee if the financial statements had been as presented in the restatement. Incentive-based compensation is defined broadly to include bonuses, awards or grants of cash or equity under any of our short or long-term incentive compensation or bonus plans, including but not limited to the LTIP and the EPIP, in each instance where the bonuses, awards or grants are based in whole or in part on the achievement of financial results. The policy gives the compensation committee discretion to interpret and apply the policy.

Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines; Anti-Pledging/Hedging Policy

        Our Board has established stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers, including the NEOs. The ownership guidelines specify a target number of shares of our common stock that our executive officers are expected to accumulate and hold within five years of appointment to the applicable position. Pursuant to these guidelines, each of our executive officers is expected to own or acquire shares of our common stock having a fair market value of a multiple of his or her base salary as follows: Chief Executive Officer—4.0x; President—2.5x; Executive Vice Presidents—2.0x; and All Other Executive Officers (which includes the heads of each of our operating groups)—1.5x.

        Our Corporate Governance Guidelines also provide for a retention guideline, or holding period, of one year for stock acquired upon the exercise of options or lapse of restrictions on restricted stock (net of funds reasonably expected to be necessary to satisfy applicable taxes and/or pay the exercise price of stock options) that applies to our executive officers, including our NEOs.

        Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines and our insider trading policy, our directors and executive officers, including our NEOs, are prohibited from hedging the economic risk of ownership of our company's stock, including through the use of puts, calls, equity swaps or other derivative securities or from entering into any pledge arrangements after March 2013 that use our company's stock as collateral for a loan or other purposes.

26

---

Table of Contents

Tax Deductibility Considerations

        It is the responsibility of our compensation committee to address the issues raised by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. Section 162(m) generally prohibits us from deducting the compensation of certain NEOs that exceeds $1,000,000 during any year. The limitation does not apply to compensation based on achievement of pre-established performance goals if certain requirements are met. Our EPIP is structured to permit awards to qualify as performance-based compensation to maximize the tax deductibility of such awards. Our compensation committee, as it deems appropriate, uses and intends to use performance-based compensation to limit the amount of compensation paid by us that would not be eligible for deductibility. However, our compensation committee believes that we must be able to attract, retain and reward the executive leadership necessary to develop and execute our strategic plans and that the loss of a tax deduction may be necessary and appropriate in some circumstances. Accordingly, our compensation committee may exercise its discretion to award compensation in excess of the Section 162(m) limits as it deems necessary or appropriate.

Compensation Tables

Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal 2014

        The table below shows the compensation for each of our NEOs for the applicable fiscal years:

27

---

Table of Contents

In addition, our NEOs, from time to time, receive discounts on merchandise purchased directly from our distribution centers or through our direct to consumer channels and may, from time to time, receive complimentary meals at our Tommy Bahama restaurants or allowances for apparel merchandise. We do not believe that the aggregate incremental cost to us of these discounts and benefits exceeds $10,000 for any of our NEOs and are excluded from this table.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2014

        The following table presents information for fiscal 2014 regarding equity awards granted under our LTIP and possible cash awards that could have been earned for fiscal 2014 performance under our EPIP or other special cash long-term incentive opportunities.

28

---

Table of Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2014 Year-End

        The following table provides information with respect to unvested equity awards held by our NEOs as of January 31, 2015. Our NEOs did not hold any unexercised stock options at the end of fiscal 2014.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested During Fiscal 2014

        There were no stock options exercised or restricted shares that vested for any of our NEOs during fiscal 2014.

Fiscal 2014 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation

        The following table shows the activity under our Deferred Compensation Plan for each of our NEOs during fiscal 2014.

29

---

Table of Contents

        Under the Deferred Compensation Plan, participants may elect to have contributions during a given calendar year distributed as either:

•

in-service distributions starting at least two years following the year of the applicable contributions in a single sum or in annual installment payments over a period of up to five years; or



•

following a deemed retirement (which occurs when a participant reaches age 55 with at least five years of service) generally in a single sum or in annual installment payments over a period of up to 15 years.

        Distribution of account balances in a single sum is automatically made on termination for reasons other than a deemed retirement. Participants elect to invest their account balances among a variety of investment options in an array of asset classes, and earnings are based on the equivalent returns from the elected investment options. Accounts are 100% vested at all times.

Potential Payments on Termination or Change of Control

LTIP Awards

        The fiscal 2014 equity awards, described under "—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation" above (as well as our fiscal 2012 equity awards outstanding as of January 31, 2015), provide for "double trigger" vesting, meaning that the awards require a change of control of our company and a termination of the individual's employment either by the individual for good reason or us or our acquirer without cause (which we refer to as a "change of control termination") to accelerate vesting.

        The following table summarizes the value of the shares of our common stock that would be realized by each NEO if a change of control termination had occurred on January 31, 2015 (which for this purpose assumes that the change of control of our company occurred prior to the end of fiscal 2014):

30

---

Table of Contents

Other Potential Post-Employment Payments

        Executive Medical Insurance Plan; Other Benefit and Welfare Plans.    Upon termination of employment, our NEOs are ineligible to continue participation under the Executive Medical Plan and our other benefit and welfare plans (subject to rights to participate in continuation coverage).

        General.    We did not have any other arrangement, policy or plan that would provide payments or benefits to any of our NEOs as a result of a termination of any kind, including following a change of control, other than benefits payable to salaried employees of our company on a non-discriminatory basis.

NOMINATING, COMPENSATION & GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE REPORT

        In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Nominating, Compensation & Governance Committee reviewed and discussed with management the Company's Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Based on such review and discussions, the Nominating, Compensation & Governance Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and incorporated by reference into the Company's Fiscal 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Respectfully submitted,

Clarence H. Smith, Chairman
Dennis M. Love
Helen Ballard

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

        Dennis M. Love, Clarence H. Smith, Helen Ballard and E. Jenner Wood III served on our NC&G Committee during fiscal 2014. None of them are current officers or employees of our company or any subsidiary, none of them are former officers of our company or any subsidiary and, except for Mr. Wood, who is employed by SunTrust with whom we continued our long-standing banking relationship during fiscal 2014, as further described below under "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions," none of them has any other relationship requiring disclosure by us under any paragraph of Item 404 of Regulation S-K.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

        Our Board or Executive Committee reviews all transactions that are disclosable under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K. To help identify these related party transactions, each director and executive officer annually completes a questionnaire that requires the disclosure of any transaction or relationship that the individual, or any member of his or her immediate family, has or will have with our company. Our Legal Department, with the assistance of other members of senior management, also reviews contemplated transactions to consider whether one of our directors or executive officers, or a company with which one of our directors or executive officers is affiliated, proposes to engage in a transaction that our Board should review.

        Our Board or Executive Committee will only approve related party transactions that are in, or not inconsistent with, the best interests of our company and our shareholders. In determining whether to approve or reject a related party transaction, our Board considers such information as it deems important to determine whether the transaction is on reasonable and competitive terms and is fair to our company. Consistent with our process for reviewing related party transactions, our Board or Executive Committee reviewed and approved each of the agreements described below.

SunTrust; Mr. Wood

        Mr. E. Jenner Wood III, one of our directors, is Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Atlanta division of SunTrust Bank. An affiliate of SunTrust has acted as lead arranger and bookrunner in connection with our syndicated, revolving credit facility, and certain other subsidiaries of SunTrust act as agent and lender and provide other services under this facility. The loan was made in the ordinary course of business, was made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with persons not related to the lender and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable features. Our aggregate payments to SunTrust were approximately $700,000 during fiscal 2014, and these payments represented an immaterial percentage of the Company's and SunTrust's revenues in 2014. In addition, we have engaged an affiliate of SunTrust to provide us certain financial advisory services, the payments of which are undeterminable at this time but are not in any event expected to

31

---

Table of Contents

represent more than an immaterial percentage of the Company's or SunTrust's revenues. Mr. Wood does not personally participate in or benefit from any aspect of our relationship with SunTrust.

Earnout Agreement; Mr. Beaumont

        In connection with our acquisition of Sugartown Worldwide, Inc. in 2010, we entered into an earnout agreement pursuant to which the beneficial owners of the capital stock of Sugartown prior to the acquisition would be entitled to earn up to $20 million in cash, in the aggregate, over the four years following the closing of the acquisition based on our Lilly Pulitzer Group's achievement of certain performance targets. Mr. Scott A. Beaumont, one of our executive officers who was appointed CEO, Lilly Pulitzer Group, in connection with our acquisition of Sugartown, together with various trusts for the benefit of certain of his family members, held a 50% ownership interest in the capital stock of Sugartown prior to the acquisition. The agreement concluded in accordance with its terms at the end of fiscal 2014, and the counterparties to the earnout agreement earned the maximum earnout payments pursuant to the agreement, which included: payment of $2.5 million during fiscal 2014 in respect of our Lilly Pulitzer Group's performance during fiscal 2013; payment of $2.5 million following the conclusion of fiscal 2014 in respect of our Lilly Pulitzer Group's performance during fiscal 2014; and payment of $10.0 million following the conclusion of fiscal 2014 in respect of our Lilly Pulitzer Group's cumulative performance over the full four year performance period.

AUDIT-RELATED MATTERS

Report of the Audit Committee

        The Audit Committee, which operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors of Oxford Industries, Inc., is composed of independent directors and oversees, on behalf of the Board of Directors, the Company's financial reporting process and system of internal control over financial reporting.

        In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Audit Committee has:

•

reviewed and discussed with management the audited financial statements included in the Company's Fiscal 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K;



•

discussed with Ernst & Young LLP, the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, the matters required to be discussed under Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended, Communications with Audit Committees;



•

received from Ernst & Young LLP the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding Ernst & Young LLP's communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and considered whether the independent auditors' provision of other non-audit services to the Company is compatible with the auditors' independence and discussed with Ernst & Young LLP its independence; and



•

based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in the Company's Fiscal 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Respectfully Submitted,

George C. Guynn, Chairman
Thomas C. Gallagher
John R. Holder
Clyde C. Tuggle

32

---

Table of Contents

Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

        The following table summarizes certain fees that we paid in respect of each of fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013 to Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, for professional services:

        Audit Fees.    "Audit fees" are fees for the audit of our consolidated financial statements, reviews of our quarterly consolidated financial statements included in Forms 10-Q filed with the SEC, statutory audits of subsidiaries and services provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings.

        Audit-Related Fees.    "Audit-related fees" are fees for audit-related services such as services related to assistance with implementation of recently adopted rules and regulations, compliance with rules and regulations applicable to accounting matters and audits performed pursuant to certain lease agreements.

        Tax Fees.    "Tax fees" are fees for tax compliance, planning and advisory services, including fees associated with tax planning and related advisory services associated with business acquisitions.

        The Audit Committee considered the effects that the provision of the services described above under the subheadings "Audit-related fees" and "Tax fees" may have on the auditors' independence and has determined that such independence has been maintained.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditors

        Our Audit Committee has adopted a policy for the pre-approval of services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. Unless a service to be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm has received general pre-approval under the policy, it requires specific pre-approval by our Audit Committee or the chair of our Audit Committee before the commencement of the service. The pre-approval policy is detailed as to the particular services to be provided, and our Audit Committee is to be informed about each service provided.

        Specific pre-approval is required for significant recurring annual engagements, such as engagements for the required annual audit and quarterly reviews (including the audit of internal control over financial reporting) and statutory or employee benefit plan audits. Any individual engagement with an estimated cost of more than $75,000 must be specifically pre-approved before the commencement of the engagement, even if the service in question has received general pre-approval. In addition, further Audit Committee pre-approval is required if the aggregate fees for such engagements would exceed $200,000. As appropriate, at each Audit Committee meeting, the entire Audit Committee reviews services performed since the prior meeting pursuant to the general pre-approvals granted under the policy, as well as services, if any, pre-approved by the chair of our Audit Committee.

        The nature and dollar value of services performed under the general pre-approval guidelines are reviewed with our Audit Committee on at least an annual basis. All of the fees detailed above paid to Ernst & Young LLP for fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013 were pre-approved (either specifically or pursuant to the general pre-approvals granted under the policy) by our Audit Committee.

33

---

Table of Contents

COMMON STOCK OWNERSHIP BY MANAGEMENT
AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

        The table below sets forth certain information, as of April 17, 2015 (except as noted), regarding the beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock by owners of 5% or more of our common stock; our directors; our NEOs; and our directors and executive officers as a group. Except as set forth below, the shareholders named below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of our common stock shown as being beneficially owned by them. Unless otherwise indicated, the address for each shareholder on this table is c/o Oxford Industries, Inc., 999 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 688, Atlanta, Georgia 30309.

34

---

Table of Contents

        Under the SEC's rules, a person may be deemed to beneficially own securities in which he or she has no pecuniary interest. The information set forth above shall not be construed as an admission that any such person is, for purposes of Section 13(d) or 13(g) of the Exchange Act or otherwise, the beneficial owner of any securities disclosed above.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

        Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires that our officers and directors, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of our common stock, file with the SEC certain reports, and to furnish copies thereof to us, with respect to each such person's beneficial ownership and changes in ownership of our equity securities. Due to the complexity of the SEC's reporting rules, our Legal Department undertakes to file such reports on behalf of our directors and executive officers and has instituted procedures to assist them with these obligations. Based on a review of the company's records and other information, we believe that all required reports by our directors and executive officers were filed on a timely basis in fiscal 2014. Subsequent to the end of fiscal 2014, due to an administrative oversight, each of Messrs. Campbell, Chubb, Grassmyer, Howard, Maidment and Pillow were four days late filing a Form 4 relating to the grant of performance-based restricted shares following our NC&G Committee's certification of fiscal 2014 results.

35

---

Table of Contents

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

        The following table sets forth information concerning our equity compensation plans as of January 31, 2015:

PROPOSALS FOR SHAREHOLDER CONSIDERATION

Proposal No. 1: Election of Directors

Board of Directors

        In accordance with our articles of incorporation, our directors are divided into three classes that are as nearly equal in size as possible. Directors in each class are elected to three-year terms, with director classes serving staggered terms. A director holds office until the annual meeting of shareholders held in the year during which the director's term ends and until his or her successor is elected and qualified.

Bylaws Relating to Retirement

        Pursuant to our bylaws, an individual becomes ineligible for election or appointment as a director: (1) for any employee director (i.e., someone who concurrently serves as an employee of our company and as a member of our Board), other than an individual who has at any time served as our Chief Executive Officer, following the end of our fiscal year during which such individual reaches the age of 65; and (2) for any other individual, following the end of our fiscal year during which such individual reaches the age of 72.

Director Nominees

        Our Board currently consists of three Class I directors (Messrs. J. Reese Lanier, Dennis M. Love and Clyde C. Tuggle), four Class II directors (Messrs. Thomas C. Chubb III, John R. Holder, J. Hicks Lanier and Clarence H. Smith) and four Class III directors (Mr. Thomas C. Gallagher, Mr. George C. Guynn, Ms. Helen Ballard and Mr. E. Jenner Wood III).

        At our 2015 annual shareholders meeting, the terms of our Class II directors will expire. Mr. J. Hicks Lanier is retiring from the Board effective at the conclusion of the annual meeting.

        Our Board, on the recommendation of our NC&G Committee, has nominated each of Mr. Thomas C. Chubb III, Mr. John R. Holder and Mr. Clarence H. Smith for election at our annual meeting, each to serve for a three year term expiring in 2018 and until his respective successor is elected and qualified.

36

---

Table of Contents

        The terms of our Class I directors expire in 2017, and the terms of our Class III directors expire in 2016. Each of our Class I and Class III directors is expected to remain in office for the remainder of his or her respective term.

Required Vote

        In an uncontested election at an annual meeting of shareholders, our bylaws require that each director be elected by a majority of the votes cast with respect to such director (number of shares voted "for" a director must exceed the number of votes cast "against" that director). In accordance with our bylaws, in order for a shareholder to have nominated a director for consideration at the 2015 annual shareholders meeting, we must have received the nomination not later than the close of business on March 20, 2015. We have not received a shareholder nomination for a director for consideration at the 2015 annual shareholders meeting. Accordingly, the election of directors at the 2015 annual shareholders meeting is an uncontested election.

        Under Georgia law, if, in an uncontested election at the annual meeting, a nominee who is already serving as a director is not elected, the director would continue to serve on our Board as a "holdover director." Under our bylaws, any holdover director who fails to be elected by a majority of the votes cast with respect to such director in an uncontested election must offer to tender his or her resignation to our Board. Our Board, in consultation with any of its committees so designated, would then determine whether to accept or reject the resignation, or whether other action should be taken. Under our bylaws, our Board is required to act on the resignation and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it within 90 days from the date the election results are certified. Each of the director nominees is currently serving on our Board.

        Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the vote for the election of directors. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named.

        Each nominee has consented to serve if elected, and our Board has no reason to believe that any nominee will be unable or unwilling to serve if elected. If a nominee becomes unwilling or unable to serve prior to the annual meeting, then at the recommendation of our Board: (1) proxies will be voted for a substitute nominee selected by or at the direction of our Board; (2) the vacancy created by the inability or unwillingness of a nominee to serve will remain open until filled by our Board; or (3) our bylaws may be amended to reduce the number of directors serving on our Board.

Recommendation of our Board of Directors

        OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" EACH OF MR. THOMAS C. CHUBB III, MR. JOHN R. HOLDER AND MR. CLARENCE H. SMITH AS A CLASS II DIRECTOR.

Proposal No. 2: Approval of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

        At the recommendation of our Audit Committee, our Board has selected Ernst & Young LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2015. Ernst & Young LLP has served as our independent auditors since May 2002. As of the date of this proxy statement, we have engaged Ernst & Young LLP to review our financial statements for the first three quarters of fiscal 2015 but we have not formally engaged an independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements for fiscal 2015.

        Our Board considers Ernst & Young LLP to be well qualified and recommends that our shareholders vote to approve their selection. Shareholder approval of the selection of our independent registered public accounting firm is not required by law; however, our Board considers the solicitation of shareholder approval to be in our company's and our shareholders' best interests. A representative of Ernst & Young LLP is expected to attend the annual meeting. The representative will be given the opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to do so and is expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions from shareholders.

Required Vote

        Approval of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2015 requires the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock present at the annual meeting, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on the proposal. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal. If at the annual meeting our shareholders do not approve the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent

37

---

Table of Contents

registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2015, our Board and Audit Committee will consider whether it is appropriate to select another independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2015 and/or future years.

Recommendation of our Board of Directors

        OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" THE PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE SELECTION OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP TO SERVE AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL 2015.

Proposal No. 3: Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

Executive Compensation

        We are asking shareholders to indicate their support for our named executive officer compensation as described in this proxy statement. This "say-on-pay" proposal gives our shareholders the opportunity to express their views on our executive compensation practices. The vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement.

        As further described above under "Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis," our executive compensation programs are designed to maintain a strong link between pay and performance for compensation paid to our named executive officers; align our named executive officers' interests with those of our shareholders by creating a strong focus on stock ownership; and ensure that we are able to attract and retain talented individuals who can deliver excellent business performance.

Proposed Resolution

        We are asking our shareholders to vote on the following resolution at the annual meeting:

        RESOLVED, that the shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to the Company's named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion.

Required Vote

        Approval of the say-on-pay resolution requires the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock present at the annual meeting, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on the proposal. Because broker non-votes are counted as present at the annual meeting for quorum purposes but are not counted as entitled to vote on this proposal, they will have no effect on the vote on the resolution approving executive compensation. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal.

        The vote on this say-on-pay proposal is advisory, and therefore the results of this proposal are not binding on our company, our NC&G Committee or our Board. The results of this proposal will not overrule any decision made by our Board or NC&G Committee. Our Board and our NC&G Committee value the input of our shareholders and to the extent there is any significant vote against this say-on-pay proposal, we will consider our shareholders' concerns and our NC&G Committee will evaluate whether any actions, in fiscal 2015 or in subsequent years, are necessary to address those concerns.

Recommendation of our Board of Directors

        OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" THE RESOLUTION APPROVING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

Other Matters

        Our Board knows of no other matters that will be brought before the annual meeting, and our bylaws do not allow proposals to be presented at the annual meeting unless they were properly presented to us prior to March 20, 2015. However, if any other question that requires a vote is properly presented at the meeting, the persons named in the enclosed proxy as the proxy holders will vote on such matters as recommended by our Board or, if no recommendation is given, in their discretion to the extent permitted under applicable law.

        Approval of any other matter that properly comes before the annual meeting requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock present at the annual meeting, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on the proposal (except as otherwise provided in our articles of incorporation or bylaws or applicable law for actions that require a greater percentage of votes in favor of a proposal).

38

---

Table of Contents

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Annual Report on Form 10-K

        We will provide without charge, at the written request of any shareholder of record as of April 17, 2015, a copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2014, including the audited financial statements, as filed with the SEC, excluding exhibits. We will provide copies of the exhibits if they are requested by eligible shareholders. We may impose a reasonable fee for providing the exhibits. Requests for copies of our Annual Report on Form 10-K should be mailed to our company's headquarters at Oxford Industries, Inc., 999 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 688, Atlanta, Georgia 30309, Attention: Investor Relations.

Submission of Director Candidates by Shareholders

        Pursuant to our bylaws, to be timely, a director nomination by a shareholder must generally be delivered to our Secretary not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the date of the preceding year's annual meeting; however, if the annual meeting of shareholders is advanced more than 30 days prior to or delayed more than 30 days after the first anniversary of the preceding year's annual meeting, a director nomination submitted by a shareholder to be timely must be delivered not later than the close of business on the later of (1) the 90th day prior to the annual meeting or (2) the 10th day following the date on which public announcement of the date of such annual meeting is first made. Any recommendation received by our Secretary will be promptly forwarded to the chair of our NC&G Committee for consideration. In order for a shareholder to nominate a director candidate for consideration at our 2016 annual shareholders meeting, we must receive notice of such nomination between February 18, 2016 and March 19, 2016 (inclusive) unless the date of our 2016 annual shareholders meeting is advanced more than 30 days prior to or delayed more than 30 days after June 17, 2016. Any such nominations must comply with the other requirements for proper nominations pursuant to our bylaws.

        Our bylaws set out the specific requirements that a shareholder must satisfy in order to properly nominate a director candidate. Any shareholder filing a written notice of nomination for a director must describe various matters regarding the nominee and the shareholder, including, among other things, such information as name; address; occupation; shares, rights to acquire shares and other derivative securities held; and any relevant understandings or arrangements between the shareholder and affiliated parties, if any. A copy of the requirements for nominating a director candidate is available in print to any shareholder who so requests it. Requests for a copy of these requirements should be mailed to our company's headquarters at Oxford Industries, Inc., 999 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 688, Atlanta, GA 30309, Attention: Investor Relations.

        In addition to candidates submitted by shareholders, our NC&G Committee will also consider candidates recommended by directors, management, third party search firms and other credible sources. Candidates recommended by any of these sources will be equally evaluated and considered. Our NC&G Committee will compile a complete list of candidates recommended from any viable source and evaluate each candidate. Each candidate will be evaluated in the context of the current composition of our Board, the current needs of our Board and the long-term interests of our shareholders. In making its evaluation of possible director candidates, our NC&G Committee will consider, among other things, issues such as a candidate's independence, expertise, age, diversity, general business knowledge and experience, financial literacy, availability and commitment. After evaluating each candidate, our NC&G Committee will determine which candidates it will recommend to the full Board.

Shareholder Proposals

        Pursuant to our bylaws, in order for a shareholder proposal (other than a director nomination) to be considered at an annual meeting, the proposal must be delivered to our Secretary not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the date of the preceding year's annual meeting; however, if the annual meeting of shareholders is advanced more than 30 days prior to or delayed more than 30 days after the first anniversary of the preceding year's annual meeting, in order to be timely, a shareholder proposal must be delivered not later than the close of business on the later of (1) the 90th day prior to the annual meeting or (2) the 10th day following the date on which public announcement of the date of such annual meeting is first made. Accordingly, in order for a shareholder proposal (other than a director nomination) to be considered at our 2016 annual shareholders meeting, we must receive the proposal between February 18, 2016 and March 19, 2016 (inclusive) unless the date of our 2016 annual shareholders meeting is advanced more than 30 days prior to or delayed more than 30 days after June 17, 2016.

39

---

Table of Contents

        Our bylaws set out the specific requirements that a shareholder must satisfy in order to properly make a proposal for consideration by our shareholders at an annual meeting. Any shareholder submitting a proposal must describe various matters regarding the shareholder, including, among other things, such information as name; address; occupation; shares, rights to acquire shares and other derivative securities held; and any relevant understandings or arrangements between the shareholder and affiliated parties, if any. A copy of the requirements for submitting a shareholder proposal is available in print to any shareholder who so requests it. Requests for a copy of these requirements should be mailed to our company's headquarters at Oxford Industries, Inc., 999 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 688, Atlanta, GA 30309, Attention: Investor Relations.

        Our bylaws further contemplate that shareholders who wish to have a proposal included in our proxy statement may be permitted to do so in accordance with Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act provided the proposal is otherwise in accordance with such Rule 14a-8. In order for a proposal to be included pursuant to Rule 14a-8 in the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting, it must be submitted in writing by January 16, 2016 and comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-8.

Communications to our Board of Directors

        Mail can be addressed to our directors in care of the Office of the Secretary at our company's headquarters at Oxford Industries, Inc., 999 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 688, Atlanta, Georgia 30309. At the direction of our Board, all mail received will be opened and screened for security purposes. The mail will then be logged in. All mail, other than trivial or obscene items, will be forwarded. Trivial items will be delivered to our directors at the next scheduled meeting of our Board. Mail addressed to a particular director will be forwarded or delivered to that director. Mail addressed to "Outside Directors," "Non-Management Directors" or the "Presiding Independent Director" will be forwarded or delivered to our presiding independent director. Mail addressed to the "Board of Directors" will be forwarded or delivered to our Chairman.

Proxy Solicitation

        We will bear the cost of solicitation of proxies by our Board in connection with the annual meeting. We will reimburse brokers, fiduciaries and custodians for reasonable expenses incurred by them in forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners of our common stock held in their names. Our employees may solicit proxies by mail, telephone, facsimile, electronic mail and personal interview. We have also engaged Okapi Partners to act as our proxy solicitor and have agreed to pay it $6,500 for the year, plus reasonable out-of-pocket expenses, for such services.

        Our Fiscal 2014 Annual Report to Shareholders, which includes audited financial statements, accompanies this proxy statement.

40

---