e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended OCTOBER 31, 2009
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 1-4365
OXFORD INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Georgia
|
|
58-0831862 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
222 Piedmont Avenue, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30308
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(404) 659-2424
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares outstanding |
Title of each class |
|
as of December 4, 2009 |
Common Stock, $1 par value
|
|
16,517,053 |
OXFORD INDUSTRIES, INC.
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
For the third quarter of fiscal 2009
2
CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Our SEC filings and public announcements may include forward-looking statements about future
events. Generally, the words believe, expect, intend, estimate, anticipate, project,
will and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, which generally are not
historical in nature. We intend for all forward-looking statements contained herein, in our press
releases or on our website, and all subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements
attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf, to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995 and the provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act (which Sections were adopted as part of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995). Important assumptions relating to these forward-looking statements include,
among others, assumptions regarding the impact on consumer demand and spending of recent economic
conditions, demand for our products, timing of shipments requested by our wholesale customers,
expected pricing levels, competitive conditions, the timing and cost of planned capital
expenditures, costs of products and raw materials we purchase, access to capital and/or credit
markets, particularly in light of recent conditions in those markets, expected outcomes of pending
or potential litigation and regulatory actions and disciplined execution by key management.
Forward-looking statements reflect our current expectations, based on currently available
information, and are not guarantees of performance. Although we believe that the expectations
reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, these expectations could prove
inaccurate as such statements involve risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our ability
to control or predict. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties, or other risks or
uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial, materialize, or
should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those
anticipated, estimated or projected. Important factors relating to these risks and uncertainties
include, but are not limited to, those described in Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors in this report,
those described in Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Form 10-Q for the second quarter of fiscal
2009 and those described from time to time in our future reports filed with the SEC.
We caution that one should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak
only as of the date on which they are made. We disclaim any intention, obligation or duty to update
or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise, except as required by law.
DEFINITIONS
Unless the context requires otherwise, the following terms, or words of similar import, have
the following meanings:
Our, us or we: Oxford Industries, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries
SG&A: Selling, general and administrative expenses
SEC: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
FASB: Financial Accounting Standards Board
GAAP: Generally accepted accounting principles in the United States
Securities Exchange Act: the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010
|
|
52 weeks ending January 29, 2011 |
Fiscal 2009
|
|
52 weeks ending January 30, 2010 |
Fiscal 2008
|
|
52 weeks ended January 31, 2009 |
First nine months of fiscal 2009
|
|
39 weeks ended October 31, 2009 |
First nine months of fiscal 2008
|
|
39 weeks ended November 1, 2008 |
Fourth quarter fiscal 2009
|
|
13 weeks ending January 30, 2010 |
Third quarter fiscal 2009
|
|
13 weeks ended October 31, 2009 |
Second quarter fiscal 2009
|
|
13 weeks ended August 1, 2009 |
First quarter fiscal 2009
|
|
13 weeks ended May 2, 2009 |
Fourth quarter fiscal 2008
|
|
13 weeks ended January 31, 2009 |
Third quarter fiscal 2008
|
|
13 weeks ended November 1, 2008 |
Second quarter fiscal 2008
|
|
13 weeks ended August 2, 2008 |
First quarter fiscal 2008
|
|
13 weeks ended May 3, 2008 |
3
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OXFORD INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
First |
|
|
Third |
|
Third |
|
Nine |
|
Nine |
|
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Months |
|
Months |
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
200,538 |
|
|
$ |
244,186 |
|
|
$ |
610,156 |
|
|
$ |
747,648 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
120,283 |
|
|
|
150,557 |
|
|
|
361,587 |
|
|
|
441,039 |
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
80,255 |
|
|
|
93,629 |
|
|
|
248,569 |
|
|
|
306,609 |
|
SG&A |
|
|
72,426 |
|
|
|
84,637 |
|
|
|
224,746 |
|
|
|
273,243 |
|
Amortization and impairment of intangible assets |
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
692 |
|
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
5,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,743 |
|
|
|
85,329 |
|
|
|
225,686 |
|
|
|
278,781 |
|
Royalties and other operating income |
|
|
3,596 |
|
|
|
4,584 |
|
|
|
8,981 |
|
|
|
13,123 |
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
11,108 |
|
|
|
12,884 |
|
|
|
31,864 |
|
|
|
40,951 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
5,302 |
|
|
|
6,437 |
|
|
|
16,112 |
|
|
|
18,754 |
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
5,806 |
|
|
|
6,447 |
|
|
|
15,752 |
|
|
|
22,197 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
1,568 |
|
|
|
1,672 |
|
|
|
4,469 |
|
|
|
6,432 |
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
4,238 |
|
|
$ |
4,775 |
|
|
$ |
11,283 |
|
|
$ |
15,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
|
$ |
1.01 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
15,599 |
|
|
|
15,489 |
|
|
|
15,562 |
|
|
|
15,682 |
|
Dilution |
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
15,965 |
|
|
|
15,581 |
|
|
|
15,729 |
|
|
|
15,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
See accompanying notes.
4
OXFORD INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
(in thousands, except par amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
January 31, |
|
November 1, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
5,995 |
|
|
$ |
3,290 |
|
|
$ |
8,034 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
94,503 |
|
|
|
78,567 |
|
|
|
119,960 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
83,675 |
|
|
|
129,159 |
|
|
|
108,622 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
19,908 |
|
|
|
17,273 |
|
|
|
21,120 |
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
204,081 |
|
|
|
228,289 |
|
|
|
257,736 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
83,769 |
|
|
|
89,026 |
|
|
|
93,348 |
|
Goodwill, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248,569 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
138,409 |
|
|
|
135,999 |
|
|
|
208,315 |
|
Other non-current assets, net |
|
|
23,741 |
|
|
|
20,180 |
|
|
|
26,928 |
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
450,000 |
|
|
$ |
473,494 |
|
|
$ |
834,896 |
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable and other accrued expenses |
|
$ |
74,624 |
|
|
$ |
87,723 |
|
|
$ |
89,242 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
11,656 |
|
|
|
14,027 |
|
|
|
14,972 |
|
Short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
17,479 |
|
|
|
5,083 |
|
|
|
16,038 |
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
103,759 |
|
|
|
106,833 |
|
|
|
120,252 |
|
Long-term debt, less current maturities |
|
|
161,244 |
|
|
|
194,187 |
|
|
|
219,548 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
47,432 |
|
|
|
47,244 |
|
|
|
50,562 |
|
Non-current deferred income taxes |
|
|
29,444 |
|
|
|
32,111 |
|
|
|
54,416 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $1.00 par value; 60,000 authorized and
16,528 issued and outstanding at October 31, 2009;
15,866 issued and outstanding at January 31, 2009; and
15,866 issued and outstanding at November 1, 2008 |
|
|
16,528 |
|
|
|
15,866 |
|
|
|
15,866 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
90,511 |
|
|
|
88,425 |
|
|
|
87,465 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
23,314 |
|
|
|
16,433 |
|
|
|
300,867 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(22,232 |
) |
|
|
(27,605 |
) |
|
|
(14,080 |
) |
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
108,121 |
|
|
|
93,119 |
|
|
|
390,118 |
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
450,000 |
|
|
$ |
473,494 |
|
|
$ |
834,896 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
5
OXFORD INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Nine |
|
First Nine |
|
|
Months |
|
Months |
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
11,283 |
|
|
$ |
15,765 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
14,096 |
|
|
|
15,006 |
|
Amortization and impairment of intangible assets |
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
5,538 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs and bond discount |
|
|
2,881 |
|
|
|
2,572 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
2,787 |
|
|
|
2,629 |
|
Loss on sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
416 |
|
Equity method investment income |
|
|
(901 |
) |
|
|
(875 |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(3,271 |
) |
|
|
(1,556 |
) |
Changes in working capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
(13,817 |
) |
|
|
(17,779 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
47,582 |
|
|
|
47,086 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
(2,530 |
) |
|
|
(3,490 |
) |
Current liabilities |
|
|
(17,595 |
) |
|
|
(7,781 |
) |
Other non-current assets |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
3,997 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
(242 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
41,988 |
|
|
|
61,286 |
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in unconsolidated entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(666 |
) |
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(8,419 |
) |
|
|
(17,280 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(8,419 |
) |
|
|
(17,930 |
) |
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of revolving credit arrangements |
|
|
(188,575 |
) |
|
|
(266,952 |
) |
Proceeds from revolving credit arrangements |
|
|
187,477 |
|
|
|
230,430 |
|
Repurchase of 8 7/8% Senior Unsecured Notes |
|
|
(166,805 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the issuance of 11 3/8% Senior Secured Notes |
|
|
146,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred financing costs paid |
|
|
(5,043 |
) |
|
|
(1,665 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
Dividends on common stock |
|
|
(4,406 |
) |
|
|
(11,557 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(31,007 |
) |
|
|
(49,480 |
) |
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
2,562 |
|
|
|
(6,124 |
) |
Effect of foreign currency translation on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
(754 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of year |
|
|
3,290 |
|
|
|
14,912 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period |
|
$ |
5,995 |
|
|
$ |
8,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest, net |
|
$ |
10,220 |
|
|
$ |
12,850 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
$ |
9,493 |
|
|
$ |
11,192 |
|
See accompanying notes.
6
OXFORD INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
THIRD QUARTER OF FISCAL 2009
1. |
|
Basis of Presentation: The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim financial reporting and the
instructions of Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include
all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP. We believe the accompanying unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all normal, recurring adjustments that
are necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position and results of operations as
of the date and for the periods presented. Results of operations for the interim periods
presented are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for our fiscal year. The
accounting policies applied during the interim periods presented are consistent with the
significant accounting policies described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2008.
We evaluated all activity through December 10, 2009 (the issue date of our condensed
consolidated financial statements) and concluded that no subsequent events have occurred that
would require recognition or disclosure in our condensed consolidated financial statements as
of October 31, 2009. |
Recently Adopted Standards:
In June 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the ASC) as the source
of authoritative GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied to nongovernmental entities. The ASC
also recognizes rules and interpretive releases of the SEC as authoritative GAAP for SEC
registrants. The ASC, which became effective in the third quarter of 2009, supersedes all existing
non-SEC accounting and reporting standards but does not change GAAP. Accordingly, references to
standards issued prior to the codification have been replaced with a description of the applicable
accounting guidance.
In December 2007, the FASB issued new guidance which established principles and requirements for
recognizing and measuring identifiable assets and goodwill acquired, liabilities assumed and any
noncontrolling interest in an acquisition, at their fair values as of the acquisition date. We
adopted this new guidance at the beginning of the first quarter of fiscal 2009. As we did not
complete any business combinations in the first nine months of fiscal 2009, the adoption of this
guidance had no impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements for that period. We
expect that this guidance would have an impact on our accounting for future business combinations.
In September 2006, the FASB issued new guidance which defines fair value, establishes a framework
for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. The new guidance does not require any new fair value measurements, but provided that
companies could elect to change historical practices in measuring fair value upon adoption. The new
guidance was effective in February 2008 for all financial assets and liabilities and for
nonfinancial assets and liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis and
in February 2009 for all other nonfinancial assets and liabilities. The adoption of this new
guidance did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued new guidance which requires disclosures about the fair value of
financial instruments in interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies, as well as in
annual financial statements. This guidance was effective at the beginning of the second quarter of
fiscal 2009. Our financial instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, accounts payable and long-term debt. Given their short-term nature, the carrying amount
of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate their fair
values. Additionally, the carrying amounts of our variable-rate borrowings approximate fair value.
Given the limited trading activity of our fixed rate debt, it is impracticable to estimate the fair value of our fixed rate debt as of October 31, 2009. The significant terms of our variable rate and
fixed rate debt which would be used in estimating the fair value of those instruments are disclosed
in Note 5. Accordingly, the adoption of this new guidance did not have a material impact on our
condensed consolidated financial statements.
In June 2008, the FASB issued new guidance relative to determining whether instruments granted in
share-based payment transactions are participating securities. It clarifies that unvested
share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents
(whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and are to be included in the computation of
earnings per share under the two-class method. The new guidance was effective at the beginning of
the first quarter of fiscal 2009 and requires all prior-period earnings per share data that is
presented to be adjusted retrospectively. The adoption of this new guidance did not have a material
impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements in the first nine months of fiscal 2009.
7
In May 2009, the FASB issued new guidance relative to subsequent events. The new guidance does not
result in significant changes in the subsequent events that an entity reports in its financial
statements. The new guidance requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has
evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date, that is, whether that date represents the
date the financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. The new guidance was
effective at the beginning of the second quarter of fiscal 2009. The adoption of this new guidance
did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.
2. |
|
Inventories: The components of inventories as of the dates specified are summarized as
follows (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
January 31, |
|
November 1, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Finished goods |
|
$ |
105,486 |
|
|
$ |
146,200 |
|
|
$ |
129,339 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
5,269 |
|
|
|
6,440 |
|
|
|
7,187 |
|
Fabric, trim and supplies |
|
|
5,318 |
|
|
|
8,917 |
|
|
|
11,146 |
|
LIFO reserve |
|
|
(32,398 |
) |
|
|
(32,398 |
) |
|
|
(39,050 |
) |
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
83,675 |
|
|
$ |
129,159 |
|
|
$ |
108,622 |
|
|
|
|
3. |
|
Comprehensive Income (loss): Comprehensive income (loss), which reflects the effects of
foreign currency translation adjustments, is calculated as follows for the periods presented
(in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Nine |
|
First Nine |
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
Third Quarter |
|
Months |
|
Months |
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
4,238 |
|
|
$ |
4,775 |
|
|
$ |
11,283 |
|
|
$ |
15,765 |
|
Gain (loss) on foreign currency translation, net of tax |
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
(26,418 |
) |
|
|
5,373 |
|
|
|
(27,143 |
) |
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
4,012 |
|
|
$ |
(21,643 |
) |
|
$ |
16,656 |
|
|
$ |
(11,378 |
) |
|
|
|
4. |
|
Operating Group Information: Our business is operated through our four operating groups:
Tommy Bahama, Ben Sherman, Lanier Clothes and Oxford Apparel. We identify our operating groups
based on the way our management organizes the components of our business for purposes of
allocating resources and assessing performance. Corporate and Other is a reconciling category
for reporting purposes and includes our corporate offices, substantially all financing
activities, elimination of inter-segment sales, LIFO inventory accounting adjustments and
other costs that are not allocated to the operating groups. Corporate and Other includes a
LIFO reserve of $32.4 million, $32.4 million and $39.1 million as of October 31, 2009, January
31, 2009 and November 1, 2008, respectively. |
The table below presents certain information about our operating groups (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Nine |
|
First Nine |
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
Third Quarter |
|
Months |
|
Months |
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tommy Bahama |
|
$ |
75,403 |
|
|
$ |
83,726 |
|
|
$ |
268,262 |
|
|
$ |
324,991 |
|
Ben Sherman |
|
|
29,844 |
|
|
|
38,235 |
|
|
|
77,690 |
|
|
|
107,317 |
|
Lanier Clothes |
|
|
35,555 |
|
|
|
44,314 |
|
|
|
92,266 |
|
|
|
111,185 |
|
Oxford Apparel |
|
|
60,155 |
|
|
|
78,082 |
|
|
|
172,823 |
|
|
|
204,790 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
(419 |
) |
|
|
(171 |
) |
|
|
(885 |
) |
|
|
(635 |
) |
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
200,538 |
|
|
$ |
244,186 |
|
|
$ |
610,156 |
|
|
$ |
747,648 |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tommy Bahama |
|
$ |
3,663 |
|
|
$ |
4,009 |
|
|
$ |
10,968 |
|
|
$ |
11,677 |
|
Ben Sherman |
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
1,801 |
|
|
|
1,760 |
|
Lanier Clothes |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
712 |
|
Oxford Apparel |
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
682 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,837 |
|
|
$ |
5,023 |
|
|
$ |
14,096 |
|
|
$ |
15,006 |
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Nine |
|
First Nine |
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
Third Quarter |
|
Months |
|
Months |
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
|
|
Amortization and Impairment of Intangible Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tommy Bahama |
|
$ |
222 |
|
|
$ |
355 |
|
|
$ |
666 |
|
|
$ |
1,064 |
|
Ben Sherman |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
1,047 |
|
Lanier Clothes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,267 |
|
Oxford Apparel |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
1,160 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
317 |
|
|
$ |
692 |
|
|
$ |
940 |
|
|
$ |
5,538 |
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tommy Bahama |
|
$ |
2,143 |
|
|
$ |
689 |
|
|
$ |
27,772 |
|
|
$ |
38,315 |
|
Ben Sherman |
|
|
2,323 |
|
|
|
3,242 |
|
|
|
(5,961 |
) |
|
|
1,495 |
|
Lanier Clothes |
|
|
5,243 |
|
|
|
4,482 |
|
|
|
10,681 |
|
|
|
(6,894 |
) |
Oxford Apparel |
|
|
6,342 |
|
|
|
7,346 |
|
|
|
15,664 |
|
|
|
16,409 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
(4,943 |
) |
|
|
(2,875 |
) |
|
|
(16,292 |
) |
|
|
(8,374 |
) |
|
|
|
Total Operating Income |
|
$ |
11,108 |
|
|
$ |
12,884 |
|
|
$ |
31,864 |
|
|
$ |
40,951 |
|
Interest Expense, net |
|
|
5,302 |
|
|
|
6,437 |
|
|
|
16,112 |
|
|
|
18,754 |
|
|
|
|
Earnings Before Income Taxes |
|
$ |
5,806 |
|
|
$ |
6,447 |
|
|
$ |
15,752 |
|
|
$ |
22,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
January 31, |
|
November 1, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tommy Bahama |
|
$ |
267,296 |
|
|
$ |
283,427 |
|
|
$ |
509,769 |
|
Ben Sherman |
|
|
76,704 |
|
|
|
74,114 |
|
|
|
172,765 |
|
Lanier Clothes |
|
|
39,670 |
|
|
|
49,988 |
|
|
|
70,750 |
|
Oxford Apparel |
|
|
74,867 |
|
|
|
72,731 |
|
|
|
86,916 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
(8,537 |
) |
|
|
(6,766 |
) |
|
|
(5,304 |
) |
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
450,000 |
|
|
$ |
473,494 |
|
|
$ |
834,896 |
|
|
|
|
9
5. |
|
Debt: The following table details our debt (in thousands) as of the dates specified: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
January 31, |
|
November 1, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
$175 million U.S. Secured Revolving Credit Facility
(U.S. Revolving Credit Agreement), which is limited
to a borrowing base consisting of specified percentages
of eligible categories of assets, accrues interest
(2.08% at October 31, 2009), unused line fees and
letter of credit fees based upon a pricing grid which
is tied to average unused availability, requires
interest payments monthly with principal due at
maturity (August 2013) and is secured by a first
priority security interest in the accounts receivable
(other than royalty payments in respect of trademark
licenses), inventory, investment property (including
the equity interests of certain subsidiaries), general
intangibles (other than trademarks, trade names and
related rights), deposit accounts, intercompany
obligations, equipment, goods, documents, contracts,
books and records and other personal property of Oxford
Industries, Inc. and substantially all of its domestic
subsidiaries and a second priority interest in those
assets in which the holders of the 11 3/8% Senior
Secured Notes have a first priority interest (1) |
|
$ |
26,821 |
|
|
$ |
27,722 |
|
|
$ |
34,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
£12 million Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility
(U.K. Revolving Credit Agreement), which accrues
interest at the banks base rate plus 1.35% (1.85% at
October 31, 2009), requires interest payments monthly
with principal payable on demand and is collateralized
by substantially all of the United Kingdom assets of
Ben Sherman |
|
|
5,658 |
|
|
|
5,083 |
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.375% Senior Secured Notes (11 3/8% Senior Secured
Notes), which accrue interest at an annual rate of
11.375% (effective interest rate of 12%) and require
interest payments semi-annually in January and July of
each year, require payment of principal at maturity
(July 2015), are subject to certain prepayment
penalties, are secured by a first priority interest in
all U.S. registered trademarks and certain related
rights and certain future acquired real property owned
in fee simple of Oxford Industries, Inc. and
substantially all of its consolidated domestic
subsidiaries and a second priority interest in those
assets in which the lenders under the U.S. Revolving
Credit Agreement have a first priority interest (2) |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 7/8% Senior Unsecured Notes (8 7/8% Senior Unsecured
Notes), which accrued interest (effective interest
rate of 9.0%) and required interest payments
semi-annually in June and December of each year,
required payment of principal at maturity (June 2011)
and were guaranteed by certain of our domestic
subsidiaries (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,805 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
Unamortized discount (2) |
|
|
(3,756 |
) |
|
|
(340 |
) |
|
|
(452 |
) |
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
|
178,723 |
|
|
|
199,270 |
|
|
|
235,586 |
|
Short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
(17,479 |
) |
|
|
(5,083 |
) |
|
|
(16,038 |
) |
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current maturities |
|
$ |
161,244 |
|
|
$ |
194,187 |
|
|
$ |
219,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
$15.0 million of the $26.8 million outstanding under the U.S. Revolving Credit Agreement at
October 31, 2009 was classified as long-term debt as this amount represents the minimum amount we
anticipate to be outstanding under the U.S. Revolving Credit Agreement during fiscal 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
In June 2009, we issued the 11 3/8% Senior Secured Notes at 97.353% of the $150 million
principal amount, resulting in gross proceeds of $146.0 million. Proceeds from the 11 3/8% Senior
Secured Notes and borrowings under our U.S. Revolving Credit Agreement were used to fund the
satisfaction and discharge of the 8 7/8% Senior Unsecured Notes outstanding at that time.
Accordingly, we wrote off approximately $1.8 million of unamortized deferred financing costs and
unamortized discount related to the 8 7/8% Senior Unsecured Notes, which are included
in interest expense, net in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and amortization of
deferred financing costs and bond discount in our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. |
10
6. |
|
Restructuring Charges and Other Unusual Items: |
Fiscal 2009:
During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, we incurred approximately $1.4 million of charges related
to certain restructuring initiatives in our Ben Sherman operating group, substantially all of which
were included in SG&A in our condensed consolidated statements of operations. The restructuring
charges primarily relate to our exit from, and subsequent licensing of, the Ben Sherman footwear
and kids operations as well as other streamlining initiatives. These charges primarily consist of
employee termination costs and certain contract termination costs. All such costs are expected to
be paid during fiscal 2009.
Fiscal 2008:
During the second quarter of fiscal 2008, we incurred approximately $8.9 million of charges related
to restructuring in our Lanier Clothes and Oxford Apparel operating groups. In addition to these
restructuring charges, we recognized other unusual items totaling a charge of $0.3 million and a
net benefit of $1.2 million in Lanier Clothes and Oxford Apparel, respectively, substantially all
of which was reflected in SG&A in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2008, Lanier Clothes incurred restructuring charges totaling
approximately $9.2 million primarily associated with our exit from certain license agreements
relating to the Nautica® and Oscar de la Renta® brands and the restructuring of our
Arnold Brant® business. These charges include costs associated with the disposal of inventory,
payments related to license termination, the impairment of intangible assets associated with the
Arnold Brant business, severance costs and the impairment of certain property, plant and equipment.
Approximately $2.5 million and $2.2 million of these charges were recorded in SG&A and amortization
and impairment of intangible assets, respectively, with the remaining charges being recognized in
net sales and cost of goods sold in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Approximately $1.9 million of the $9.2 million of charges for Lanier Clothes was reversed in cost
of goods sold in Corporate and Other as part of LIFO accounting.
Additionally, Oxford Apparel incurred certain restructuring charges totaling approximately $1.6
million during the second quarter of fiscal 2008 associated with the decision to exit the Solitude
business. These charges include costs associated with the disposal of inventory which are
classified as a reduction to net sales and the impairment of intangible assets of $1.1 million
associated with the Solitude business which is included in amortization and impairment of
intangible assets in our condensed consolidated statements of operations. The net benefit related
to the other unusual items of $1.2 million in Oxford Apparel was primarily related to the
resolution of a contingent liability and the sale of a trademark partially offset by an increase in
our bad debt reserve due to certain customers bankruptcy filings in the second quarter of fiscal
2008.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2008, we incurred (1) an additional $0.6 million of
restructuring charges, primarily consisting of severance costs as we continued to focus on reducing
overhead within all operating groups and (2) a write-off of approximately $0.9 million of
unamortized financing costs due to the amendment and restatement of our revolving credit agreement.
11
7. |
|
Consolidating Financial Data of Subsidiary Guarantors: Our 11 3/8% Senior Secured Notes are
guaranteed by substantially all of our domestic subsidiaries (Subsidiary Guarantors). All
guarantees are full and unconditional. For consolidated financial reporting purposes,
non-guarantors consist of our subsidiaries which are organized outside the United States,
certain non-wholly owned domestic subsidiaries and certain domestic subsidiaries whose sole
assets are equity interests in foreign subsidiaries. We use the equity method of accounting
with respect to investment in subsidiaries included in other non-current assets in our
condensed consolidating financial statements. Set forth below are our condensed consolidating
balance sheets as of October 31, 2009, January 31, 2009 and November 1, 2008 (in thousands);
our condensed consolidating statements of operations for the third quarter and first nine
months of fiscal 2009 and the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2008 (in
thousands); and our condensed consolidating statements of cash flows for the first nine months
of fiscal 2009 and first nine months of fiscal 2008 (in thousands). |
OXFORD INDUSTRIES, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS
October 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oxford |
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Non- |
|
Consolidating |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
(Parent) |
|
Guarantors |
|
Guarantors |
|
Adjustments |
|
Total |
|
|
|
ASSETS |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,466 |
|
|
$ |
493 |
|
|
$ |
4,036 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,995 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
49,677 |
|
|
|
13,842 |
|
|
|
39,836 |
|
|
|
(8,852 |
) |
|
|
94,503 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
11,010 |
|
|
|
61,916 |
|
|
|
11,989 |
|
|
|
(1,240 |
) |
|
|
83,675 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
5,349 |
|
|
|
9,716 |
|
|
|
4,207 |
|
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
19,908 |
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
67,502 |
|
|
|
85,967 |
|
|
|
60,068 |
|
|
|
(9,456 |
) |
|
|
204,081 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
9,639 |
|
|
|
68,063 |
|
|
|
6,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,769 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
113,394 |
|
|
|
24,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138,409 |
|
Other non-current assets, net |
|
|
478,892 |
|
|
|
149,026 |
|
|
|
35,267 |
|
|
|
(639,444 |
) |
|
|
23,741 |
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
556,070 |
|
|
$ |
416,450 |
|
|
$ |
126,380 |
|
|
$ |
(648,900 |
) |
|
$ |
450,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
46,835 |
|
|
$ |
30,792 |
|
|
$ |
33,721 |
|
|
$ |
(7,589 |
) |
|
$ |
103,759 |
|
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
|
161,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,244 |
|
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
244,061 |
|
|
|
(199,005 |
) |
|
|
111,526 |
|
|
|
(109,150 |
) |
|
|
47,432 |
|
Non-current deferred income taxes |
|
|
(4,191 |
) |
|
|
26,812 |
|
|
|
6,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,444 |
|
Total shareholders/invested equity |
|
|
108,121 |
|
|
|
557,851 |
|
|
|
(25,690 |
) |
|
|
(532,161 |
) |
|
|
108,121 |
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
556,070 |
|
|
$ |
416,450 |
|
|
$ |
126,380 |
|
|
$ |
(648,900 |
) |
|
$ |
450,000 |
|
|
|
|
12
OXFORD INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS
January 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oxford |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
Consolidating |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(Parent) |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Total |
|
ASSETS |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,527 |
|
|
$ |
537 |
|
|
$ |
1,226 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,290 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
28,842 |
|
|
|
11,407 |
|
|
|
45,529 |
|
|
|
(7,211 |
) |
|
|
78,567 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
44,469 |
|
|
|
71,509 |
|
|
|
15,475 |
|
|
|
(2,294 |
) |
|
|
129,159 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
6,009 |
|
|
|
8,745 |
|
|
|
2,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
80,847 |
|
|
|
92,198 |
|
|
|
64,749 |
|
|
|
(9,505 |
) |
|
|
228,289 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
9,025 |
|
|
|
74,804 |
|
|
|
5,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,026 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
114,060 |
|
|
|
21,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,999 |
|
Other non-current assets, net |
|
|
453,615 |
|
|
|
145,954 |
|
|
|
35,275 |
|
|
|
(614,664 |
) |
|
|
20,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
543,554 |
|
|
$ |
427,016 |
|
|
$ |
127,093 |
|
|
$ |
(624,169 |
) |
|
$ |
473,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
Current liabilities |
|
|
41,793 |
|
|
|
26,706 |
|
|
|
45,506 |
|
|
|
(7,172 |
) |
|
|
106,833 |
|
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
|
194,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194,187 |
|
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
218,200 |
|
|
|
(172,180 |
) |
|
|
110,374 |
|
|
|
(109,150 |
) |
|
|
47,244 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(3,745 |
) |
|
|
29,607 |
|
|
|
6,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,111 |
|
Total shareholders/invested equity |
|
|
93,119 |
|
|
|
542,883 |
|
|
|
(35,036 |
) |
|
|
(507,847 |
) |
|
|
93,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
543,554 |
|
|
$ |
427,016 |
|
|
$ |
127,093 |
|
|
$ |
(624,169 |
) |
|
$ |
473,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 1, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oxford |
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Non- |
|
Consolidating |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
(Parent) |
|
Guarantors |
|
Guarantors |
|
Adjustments |
|
Total |
|
|
|
ASSETS |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
6,400 |
|
|
$ |
892 |
|
|
$ |
742 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,034 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
60,813 |
|
|
|
38,009 |
|
|
|
30,315 |
|
|
|
(9,177 |
) |
|
|
119,960 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
33,432 |
|
|
|
62,812 |
|
|
|
14,097 |
|
|
|
(1,719 |
) |
|
|
108,622 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
8,195 |
|
|
|
8,844 |
|
|
|
4,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,120 |
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
108,840 |
|
|
|
110,557 |
|
|
|
49,235 |
|
|
|
(10,896 |
) |
|
|
257,736 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
9,181 |
|
|
|
78,640 |
|
|
|
5,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,348 |
|
Goodwill, net |
|
|
1,847 |
|
|
|
168,932 |
|
|
|
77,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248,569 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
131,515 |
|
|
|
76,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208,315 |
|
Other non-current assets, net |
|
|
813,500 |
|
|
|
150,406 |
|
|
|
35,277 |
|
|
|
(972,255 |
) |
|
|
26,928 |
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
933,444 |
|
|
$ |
640,050 |
|
|
$ |
244,553 |
|
|
$ |
(983,151 |
) |
|
$ |
834,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
52,041 |
|
|
$ |
46,357 |
|
|
$ |
30,793 |
|
|
$ |
(8,939 |
) |
|
$ |
120,252 |
|
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
|
219,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
219,548 |
|
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
275,153 |
|
|
|
(223,522 |
) |
|
|
108,077 |
|
|
|
(109,146 |
) |
|
|
50,562 |
|
Non-current deferred income taxes |
|
|
(3,416 |
) |
|
|
36,411 |
|
|
|
21,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,416 |
|
Total shareholders/invested equity |
|
|
390,118 |
|
|
|
780,804 |
|
|
|
84,262 |
|
|
|
(865,066 |
) |
|
|
390,118 |
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
933,444 |
|
|
$ |
640,050 |
|
|
$ |
244,553 |
|
|
$ |
(983,151 |
) |
|
$ |
834,896 |
|
|
|
|
13
OXFORD INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Third Quarter Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oxford |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
Consolidating |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(Parent) |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Total |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
94,357 |
|
|
$ |
86,334 |
|
|
$ |
30,225 |
|
|
$ |
(10,378 |
) |
|
$ |
200,538 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
75,386 |
|
|
|
37,205 |
|
|
|
13,393 |
|
|
|
(5,701 |
) |
|
|
120,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
18,971 |
|
|
|
49,129 |
|
|
|
16,832 |
|
|
|
(4,677 |
) |
|
|
80,255 |
|
SG&A including amortization and impairment
of intangible assets |
|
|
12,486 |
|
|
|
51,882 |
|
|
|
14,020 |
|
|
|
(5,645 |
) |
|
|
72,743 |
|
Royalties and other operating income (loss) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
1,864 |
|
|
|
2,179 |
|
|
|
(467 |
) |
|
|
3,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
6,505 |
|
|
|
(889 |
) |
|
|
4,991 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
11,108 |
|
Interest (income) expense, net |
|
|
5,697 |
|
|
|
(1,218 |
) |
|
|
823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,302 |
|
Income (loss) from equity investment |
|
|
4,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,074 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
4,882 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
4,168 |
|
|
|
(3,573 |
) |
|
|
5,806 |
|
Income taxes (benefit) |
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
(577 |
) |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
1,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
3,912 |
|
|
$ |
906 |
|
|
$ |
3,168 |
|
|
$ |
(3,748 |
) |
|
$ |
4,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Nine Months of Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oxford |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
Consolidating |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(Parent) |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Total |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
261,231 |
|
|
$ |
296,638 |
|
|
$ |
81,358 |
|
|
$ |
(29,071 |
) |
|
$ |
610,156 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
211,155 |
|
|
|
126,134 |
|
|
|
38,777 |
|
|
|
(14,479 |
) |
|
|
361,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
50,076 |
|
|
|
170,504 |
|
|
|
42,581 |
|
|
|
(14,592 |
) |
|
|
248,569 |
|
SG&A including amortization and impairment
of intangible assets |
|
|
37,648 |
|
|
|
161,103 |
|
|
|
43,820 |
|
|
|
(16,885 |
) |
|
|
225,686 |
|
Royalties and other operating income (loss) |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
6,140 |
|
|
|
4,363 |
|
|
|
(1,576 |
) |
|
|
8,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
12,482 |
|
|
|
15,541 |
|
|
|
3,124 |
|
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
31,864 |
|
Interest (income) expense, net |
|
|
17,337 |
|
|
|
(3,935 |
) |
|
|
2,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,112 |
|
Income (loss) from equity investment |
|
|
15,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,624 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
10,769 |
|
|
|
19,476 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
(14,907 |
) |
|
|
15,752 |
|
Income taxes (benefit) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
4,507 |
|
|
|
(241 |
) |
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
4,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
10,817 |
|
|
$ |
14,969 |
|
|
$ |
655 |
|
|
$ |
(15,158 |
) |
|
$ |
11,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
OXFORD INDUSTRIES, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Third Quarter Fiscal 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oxford |
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Non- |
|
Consolidating |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
(Parent) |
|
Guarantors |
|
Guarantors |
|
Adjustments |
|
Total |
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
120,087 |
|
|
$ |
96,584 |
|
|
$ |
42,153 |
|
|
$ |
(14,638 |
) |
|
$ |
244,186 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
94,253 |
|
|
|
46,819 |
|
|
|
18,117 |
|
|
|
(8,632 |
) |
|
|
150,557 |
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
25,834 |
|
|
|
49,765 |
|
|
|
24,036 |
|
|
|
(6,006 |
) |
|
|
93,629 |
|
SG&A including amortization and impairment of
intangible assets |
|
|
16,590 |
|
|
|
56,607 |
|
|
|
18,224 |
|
|
|
(6,092 |
) |
|
|
85,329 |
|
Royalties and other operating income (loss) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3,119 |
|
|
|
1,723 |
|
|
|
(260 |
) |
|
|
4,584 |
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
9,246 |
|
|
|
(3,723 |
) |
|
|
7,535 |
|
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
12,884 |
|
Interest (income) expense, net |
|
|
6,935 |
|
|
|
(2,814 |
) |
|
|
2,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,437 |
|
Income from equity investment |
|
|
4,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,494 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
6,805 |
|
|
|
(909 |
) |
|
|
5,219 |
|
|
|
(4,668 |
) |
|
|
6,447 |
|
Income taxes (benefit) |
|
|
1,917 |
|
|
|
(1,131 |
) |
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
1,672 |
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
4,888 |
|
|
$ |
222 |
|
|
$ |
4,272 |
|
|
$ |
(4,607 |
) |
|
$ |
4,775 |
|
|
|
|
First Nine Months of Fiscal 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oxford |
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Non- |
|
Consolidating |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
(Parent) |
|
Guarantors |
|
Guarantors |
|
Adjustments |
|
Total |
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
310,481 |
|
|
$ |
355,692 |
|
|
$ |
116,406 |
|
|
$ |
(34,931 |
) |
|
$ |
747,648 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
245,934 |
|
|
|
161,670 |
|
|
|
50,226 |
|
|
|
(16,791 |
) |
|
|
441,039 |
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
64,547 |
|
|
|
194,022 |
|
|
|
66,180 |
|
|
|
(18,140 |
) |
|
|
306,609 |
|
SG&A including amortization and impairment of
intangible assets |
|
|
55,266 |
|
|
|
184,449 |
|
|
|
58,128 |
|
|
|
(19,062 |
) |
|
|
278,781 |
|
Royalties and other operating income (loss) |
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
9,053 |
|
|
|
4,912 |
|
|
|
(1,381 |
) |
|
|
13,123 |
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
9,820 |
|
|
|
18,626 |
|
|
|
12,964 |
|
|
|
(459 |
) |
|
|
40,951 |
|
Interest (income) expense, net |
|
|
20,453 |
|
|
|
(8,875 |
) |
|
|
7,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,754 |
|
Income from equity investment |
|
|
25,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,015 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
14,382 |
|
|
|
27,501 |
|
|
|
5,788 |
|
|
|
(25,474 |
) |
|
|
22,197 |
|
Income taxes (benefit) |
|
|
(1,681 |
) |
|
|
6,862 |
|
|
|
1,412 |
|
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
6,432 |
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
16,063 |
|
|
$ |
20,639 |
|
|
$ |
4,376 |
|
|
$ |
(25,313 |
) |
|
$ |
15,765 |
|
|
|
|
15
OXFORD INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
First Nine Months of Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oxford |
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Non- |
|
Consolidating |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
(Parent) |
|
Guarantors |
|
Guarantors |
|
Adjustments |
|
Total |
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
7,454 |
|
|
$ |
31,272 |
|
|
$ |
3,262 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
41,988 |
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(1,854 |
) |
|
|
(5,111 |
) |
|
|
(1,454 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,419 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(1,854 |
) |
|
|
(5,111 |
) |
|
|
(1,454 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,419 |
) |
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in debt |
|
|
(21,677 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,874 |
) |
Payments of debt issuance costs |
|
|
(5,043 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,043 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
316 |
|
Change in intercompany payable |
|
|
25,149 |
|
|
|
(26,205 |
) |
|
|
1,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends on common stock |
|
|
(4,406 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,406 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(5,661 |
) |
|
|
(26,205 |
) |
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,007 |
) |
|
|
|
Net change in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
2,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,562 |
|
Effect of foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at the Beginning of Period |
|
|
1,527 |
|
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
1,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,290 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at the End of
Period |
|
$ |
1,466 |
|
|
$ |
493 |
|
|
$ |
4,036 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,995 |
|
|
|
|
First Nine Months of Fiscal 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oxford |
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Non- |
|
Consolidating |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
(Parent) |
|
Guarantors |
|
Guarantors |
|
Adjustments |
|
Total |
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
20,801 |
|
|
$ |
42,844 |
|
|
$ |
(2,144 |
) |
|
$ |
(215 |
) |
|
$ |
61,286 |
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in unconsolidated entity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(628 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(666 |
) |
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(2,656 |
) |
|
|
(13,680 |
) |
|
|
(944 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,280 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(2,640 |
) |
|
|
(14,308 |
) |
|
|
(982 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,930 |
) |
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in debt |
|
|
(38,762 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
2,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,522 |
) |
Deferred financing costs paid |
|
|
(1,665 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,665 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
264 |
|
Change in intercompany payable |
|
|
31,884 |
|
|
|
(28,676 |
) |
|
|
(3,423 |
) |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends on common stock |
|
|
(5,599 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,958 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,557 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(13,861 |
) |
|
|
(28,694 |
) |
|
|
(7,140 |
) |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
(49,480 |
) |
|
|
|
Net change in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
4,300 |
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
(10,266 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,124 |
) |
Effect of foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(754 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(754 |
) |
Cash and Cash Equivalents at the Beginning of Period |
|
|
2,100 |
|
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
11,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,912 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at the End of Period |
|
$ |
6,400 |
|
|
$ |
892 |
|
|
$ |
742 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,034 |
|
|
|
|
16
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements and the notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements contained in this report and the consolidated financial statements, notes to
consolidated financial statements and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2008.
INTRODUCTION
We generate revenues and cash flow primarily through the design, production, sale and distribution
of branded and private label consumer apparel for men and women and the licensing of company-owned
trademarks. Our principal markets and customers are located in the United States and, to a lesser
extent, the United Kingdom. We source substantially all of our products through third-party
manufacturers located outside of the United States and United Kingdom. We distribute the majority
of our products through our wholesale customers, which include chain stores, department stores,
specialty stores, specialty catalog retailers, mass merchants and Internet retailers. We also sell
products of certain owned brands through our owned and licensed retail stores and e-commerce
websites.
Our business is operated through our four operating groups: Tommy Bahama, Ben Sherman, Lanier
Clothes and Oxford Apparel. We identify our operating groups based on the way our management
organizes the components of our business for purposes of allocating resources and assessing
performance.
Tommy Bahama designs, sources and markets collections of mens and womens sportswear and related
products. Tommy Bahama® products can be found in our owned and licensed Tommy Bahama retail stores
and on our e-commerce website as well as in certain department stores and independent specialty
stores throughout the United States. The target consumers of Tommy Bahama are affluent men and
women age 35 and older who embrace a relaxed and casual approach to daily living. We also license
the Tommy Bahama name for various product categories and operate Tommy Bahama restaurants.
Ben Sherman is a London-based designer, marketer and distributor of branded sportswear and related
products. Ben Sherman® was established in 1963 as an edgy, young mens, Mod-inspired shirt brand
and has evolved into a British lifestyle brand of apparel targeted at youthful-thinking men and
women age 19 to 35 throughout the world. We offer a full Ben Sherman sportswear collection as well
as tailored clothing and accessories. Our Ben Sherman products can be found in certain department
stores and a variety of independent specialty stores, as well as in our owned and licensed Ben
Sherman retail stores and on our e-commerce websites. We also license the Ben Sherman name for
various product categories.
Lanier Clothes designs and markets branded and private label mens suits, sportcoats, suit
separates and dress slacks across a wide range of price points. Certain Lanier Clothes products are
sold using trademarks licensed to us by third parties, including Kenneth Cole®, Dockers®, and
Geoffrey Beene®. We also offer branded tailored clothing products under our Billy London® and
Arnold Brant® trademarks. In addition to our branded businesses, we design and source certain
private label tailored clothing products, which are products sold exclusively to one customer under
a brand name that is owned or licensed by such customer. Significant private label brands include
Stafford®, Alfani®, Tasso Elba® and Lands End®. Our Lanier Clothes products are sold to national
chains, department stores, mass merchants, specialty stores, specialty catalog retailers and
discount retailers throughout the United States.
Oxford Apparel produces branded and private label dress shirts, suit separates, sport shirts,
casual slacks, outerwear, sweaters, jeans, swimwear, westernwear and golf apparel. We design and
source certain private label programs for several customers, including programs for Mens
Wearhouse, Lands End, Target, Macys and Sears. Significant owned brands of Oxford Apparel include
Oxford Golf®, Ely®, Cattleman® and Cumberland Outfitters®. Oxford Apparel also owns a two-thirds
interest in the entity that owns the Hathaway® trademark in the United States and several other
countries. Additionally, Oxford Apparel licenses from third parties the right to use certain
trademarks including Dockers® and United States Polo Association® for certain apparel products. Our
Oxford Apparel products are sold to a variety of department stores, mass merchants, specialty
catalog retailers, discount retailers, specialty stores, green grass golf merchants and Internet
retailers throughout the United States.
Corporate and Other is a reconciling category for reporting purposes and includes our corporate
office, substantially all financing activities, elimination of inter-segment sales, LIFO inventory
accounting adjustments and other costs that are not allocated to the operating groups. LIFO
inventory calculations are made on a legal entity basis which does not
17
correspond to our operating group definitions, as portions of Lanier Clothes and Oxford Apparel are
on the LIFO basis of accounting. Therefore, LIFO inventory accounting adjustments are not allocated
to operating groups.
For further information regarding our operating groups, see Note 4 to our unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements included in this report and Part I, Item 1, Business in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2008.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
As a result of the weak global economic conditions, fiscal 2008 was a particularly challenging year
for our company. These challenging economic conditions continued to impact each of our operating
groups in the first nine months of fiscal 2009. We expect that these challenging economic
conditions will continue to impact each of our operating groups beyond fiscal 2009. In the current
economic environment, we believe it is important to continue to focus on maintaining a healthy
balance sheet and sufficient liquidity. Significant initiatives we have taken in the last two years
to achieve these objectives have included reducing working capital requirements, moderating capital
expenditures for retail stores, reducing overhead and issuing the $150 million aggregate principal
amount of 11 3/8% Senior Secured Notes in June 2009 and the related satisfaction and discharge of
our remaining 8 7/8% Senior Unsecured Notes.
The apparel and retail industry is cyclical and dependent upon the overall level of discretionary
consumer spending, which changes as regional, domestic and international economic conditions
change. The impact of negative economic conditions may have a longer and more severe impact on the
apparel and retail industry than the same conditions would have on other industries. Therefore,
even if conditions improve in the general economy, the negative impact on the apparel and retail
industry may continue.
The following table sets forth our consolidated operating results (in thousands, except per share
amounts) for the first nine months of fiscal 2009 compared to the first nine months of fiscal 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Nine Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
610,156 |
|
|
$ |
747,648 |
|
|
$ |
(137,492 |
) |
|
|
(18.4 |
%) |
Net earnings |
|
$ |
11,283 |
|
|
$ |
15,765 |
|
|
$ |
(4,482 |
) |
|
|
(28.4 |
%) |
Diluted net earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
(0.28 |
) |
|
|
(28.0 |
%) |
Weighted average common shares
outstanding-diluted |
|
|
15,729 |
|
|
|
15,773 |
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
%) |
The primary reasons for the decrease in diluted net earnings per common share were:
|
|
|
Net sales declined across all operating groups from the first nine months of fiscal 2008
primarily due to the impact of the challenging economic conditions. |
|
|
|
|
Operating results for Ben Sherman were also impacted by the change in the average
exchange rate between the British pound sterling and the United States dollar and
restructuring charges totaling approximately $1.4 million in the first nine months of
fiscal 2009, which were primarily related to our exit from, and subsequent licensing of,
the Ben Sherman footwear and kids operations, as well as other streamlining initiatives. |
|
|
|
|
Net sales for Lanier Clothes and Oxford Apparel were also impacted by our exit from
certain businesses in fiscal 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Royalty income decreased primarily as a result of the termination of the Tommy Bahama
footwear license agreement, a 19% decline in the average value of the British pound
sterling versus the United States dollar, which impacted Ben Sherman royalty income, as
well as the impact of the challenging economic conditions. |
|
|
|
|
A charge of $1.8 million was recognized in interest expense, net in the second quarter
of fiscal 2009 related to the satisfaction and discharge of the remaining $166.8 million
aggregate principal amount of 8 7/8% Senior Unsecured Notes. |
These items were partially offset by:
|
|
|
For the first nine months of fiscal 2008, each operating group was impacted by
restructuring charges totaling $7.7 million. |
|
|
|
|
Significant reductions were made in our SG&A across all operating groups as we
streamlined our operations and focused on our core businesses during the recent economic
conditions. |
|
|
|
|
A charge of $0.9 million was recognized in interest expense in the third quarter of
fiscal 2008 as a result of our amendment and restatement of our U.S. Revolving Credit
Agreement. |
18
|
|
|
Changes in our debt facilities which impacted interest expense, net included (1) the
amendment and restatement of our U.S. Revolving Credit Agreement in August 2008 which
provided more favorable borrowing terms than the U.S. Revolving Credit Agreement provided
for prior to August 2008, (2) our repurchase of $33.2 million of our 8 7/8% Senior
Unsecured Notes at a discount, (3) the issuance of $150.0 million aggregate principal
amount of 11 3/8% Senior Secured Notes in the second quarter of fiscal 2009, (4) the
repurchase of $166.8 million aggregate principal amount of our 8 7/8% Senior Unsecured
Notes in the second quarter of fiscal 2009, which was funded by the proceeds from our
issuance of $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of 11 3/8% Senior Secured Notes and
borrowings under our U.S. Revolving Credit Agreement and (5) varying levels of debt
outstanding under our U.S. Revolving Credit Agreement between the two periods as a result
of positive cash flows for the twelve months ended October 31, 2009. |
THIRD QUARTER OF FISCAL 2009 COMPARED TO THIRD QUARTER OF FISCAL 2008
The following table sets forth the specified line items in our unaudited condensed consolidated
statements of operations both in dollars (in thousands) and as a percentage of net sales. The table
also sets forth the dollar change and the percentage change of the data as compared to the same
period of the prior year. We have calculated all percentages based on actual data, but percentage
columns may not add due to rounding. Individual line items of our consolidated statements of
operations may not be directly comparable to those of our competitors, as classification of certain
expenses may vary by company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
200,538 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
244,186 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
(43,648 |
) |
|
|
(17.9 |
%) |
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
120,283 |
|
|
|
60.0 |
% |
|
|
150,557 |
|
|
|
61.7 |
% |
|
|
(30,274 |
) |
|
|
(20.1 |
%) |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
80,255 |
|
|
|
40.0 |
% |
|
|
93,629 |
|
|
|
38.3 |
% |
|
|
(13,374 |
) |
|
|
(14.3 |
%) |
SG&A |
|
|
72,426 |
|
|
|
36.1 |
% |
|
|
84,637 |
|
|
|
34.7 |
% |
|
|
(12,211 |
) |
|
|
(14.4 |
%) |
Amortization and impairment
of intangible assets |
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
692 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
(375 |
) |
|
|
(54.2 |
%) |
Royalties and other
operating income |
|
|
3,596 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
4,584 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
(988 |
) |
|
|
(21.6 |
%) |
|
Operating income |
|
|
11,108 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
12,884 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
(1,776 |
) |
|
|
(13.8 |
%) |
Interest expense, net |
|
|
5,302 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
6,437 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
(1,135 |
) |
|
|
(17.6 |
%) |
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
5,806 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
6,447 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
(641 |
) |
|
|
(9.9 |
%) |
Income taxes |
|
|
1,568 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
1,672 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
(6.2 |
%) |
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
4,238 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
$ |
4,775 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
$ |
(537 |
) |
|
|
(11.2 |
%) |
|
The discussion and tables below compare certain line items included in our statements of operations
for the third quarter of fiscal 2009 to the third quarter of fiscal 2008. Each dollar and
percentage change provided reflects the change between these periods unless indicated otherwise.
Each dollar and share amount included in the tables is in thousands except for per share amounts.
Net Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Tommy Bahama |
|
$ |
75,403 |
|
|
$ |
83,726 |
|
|
$ |
(8,323 |
) |
|
|
(9.9 |
%) |
Ben Sherman |
|
|
29,844 |
|
|
|
38,235 |
|
|
|
(8,391 |
) |
|
|
(21.9 |
%) |
Lanier Clothes |
|
|
35,555 |
|
|
|
44,314 |
|
|
|
(8,759 |
) |
|
|
(19.8 |
%) |
Oxford Apparel |
|
|
60,155 |
|
|
|
78,082 |
|
|
|
(17,927 |
) |
|
|
(23.0 |
%) |
Corporate and Other |
|
|
(419 |
) |
|
|
(171 |
) |
|
|
(248 |
) |
|
|
(145.0 |
%) |
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
200,538 |
|
|
$ |
244,186 |
|
|
$ |
(43,648 |
) |
|
|
(17.9 |
%) |
|
Net sales, on a consolidated basis, decreased $43.6 million, or 17.9%, in the third quarter of
fiscal 2009 compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2008 primarily as a result of the changes in
each operating group discussed below.
Tommy Bahama:
The decrease in net sales for Tommy Bahama was primarily due to a reduction in net sales at
wholesale resulting from the challenging retail environment. This decrease in wholesale sales was
partially offset by sales at our retail stores opened after the beginning of the third quarter of
fiscal 2008 and increased e-commerce sales. Unit sales decreased 13.2% due primarily to the
challenging retail environment. The average selling price per unit increased by 3.8%, as
sales at our retail stores and our e-commerce sales, both of which have higher sales prices than
wholesale sales,
19
represented a greater proportion of total Tommy Bahama sales. As of October 31,
2009 and November 1, 2008, we operated 85 and 79 Tommy Bahama retail stores, respectively.
Ben Sherman:
The decrease in net sales for Ben Sherman was primarily due to a 16.6% reduction in unit sales
primarily due to the challenging economic conditions and our exit from and subsequent licensing of
our footwear and kids operations. The decrease was further driven by a 10% reduction in the
average exchange rate of the British pound sterling versus the United States dollar during the
third quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to the average exchange rate during the third quarter of
fiscal 2008. The average selling price per unit decreased 6.4%, resulting primarily from the impact
of the weaker British pound sterling, which was partially offset by a larger percentage of total
Ben Sherman sales being sales at our retail stores, which generally have a higher sales price than
wholesale sales.
Lanier Clothes:
The decrease in net sales for Lanier Clothes was primarily due to (1) our exit from the Oscar de la
Renta and Nautica licensed businesses, with fiscal 2009 sales consisting of close out sales, (2)
the restructuring of the Arnold Brant business in fiscal 2008 and (3) the challenging economic
conditions. The exit from the Oscar de la Renta and Nautica businesses and the challenging economic
conditions resulted in a decrease in unit sales of 8.7% and also impacted our sales mix, resulting
in a decrease in the average selling price per unit of 12.2%, as the Nautica and Oscar de la Renta
businesses had higher average selling prices than certain other businesses which Lanier Clothes
continues to operate.
Oxford Apparel:
The decrease in net sales for Oxford Apparel was generally anticipated in connection with our
strategy to focus on key product categories and exit underperforming lines of business, but was
also impacted by the challenging economic conditions. Unit sales decreased by 25.0% as a result of
our exit from certain lines of business and economic conditions, and the average selling price per
unit increased by 2.7% due to changes in product mix.
Gross Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
80,255 |
|
|
$ |
93,629 |
|
|
$ |
(13,374 |
) |
|
|
(14.3 |
%) |
Gross profit % of net sales |
|
|
40.0 |
% |
|
|
38.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIFO accounting charges
included in cost of goods
sold |
|
$ |
1,288 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in gross profit was primarily due to lower sales in each operating group, as described
above. Gross margins increased to 40.0% of net sales during the third quarter of fiscal 2009 from
38.3% in the third quarter of fiscal 2008. Gross margins were positively impacted by the sales mix
between our retail operations and wholesale operations. Retail sales, which generally have higher
gross margins, represented a higher proportion of our net sales during the third quarter of fiscal
2009. The LIFO accounting charge of $1.3 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 partially
offset the improved gross margins. Ben Shermans gross margins were negatively impacted by
increased cost of goods sold related to inventory purchases denominated in United States dollars
but sold in other currencies. Our gross profit may not be directly comparable to those of our
competitors, as statement of operations classification of certain expenses may vary by company.
SG&A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
SG&A |
|
$ |
72,426 |
|
|
$ |
84,637 |
|
|
$ |
(12,211 |
) |
|
|
(14.4 |
%) |
SG&A % of net sales |
|
|
36.1 |
% |
|
|
34.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges included in SG&A |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in SG&A was primarily due to (1) significant reductions in our overhead cost
structure, (2) cost reductions associated with our exit from certain businesses, (3) the impact on
Ben Sherman of a 10% reduction in the average value of the British pound sterling versus the United
States dollar and (4) restructuring charges incurred in the third quarter of fiscal 2008 totaling
approximately $0.6 million. These cost savings were partially offset by expenses associated with
the operation of additional retail stores which opened subsequent to the beginning of the third
quarter of fiscal 2008.
20
Amortization and impairment of intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Amortization and impairment of intangible assets |
|
$ |
317 |
|
|
$ |
692 |
|
|
$ |
(375 |
) |
|
|
(54.2 |
%) |
The decrease in amortization and impairment of intangible assets was primarily the result of
amortization typically being greater in the earlier periods following an acquisition.
Royalties and other operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Royalties and other operating income |
|
$ |
3,596 |
|
|
$ |
4,584 |
|
|
$ |
(988 |
) |
|
|
(21.6 |
%) |
The decrease in royalties and other operating income was primarily due to the termination of the
license agreement for footwear in Tommy Bahama, the challenging economic conditions and a
10% decline in the average value of the British pound sterling versus the United States dollar,
which impacted Ben Sherman royalty income.
Operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Tommy Bahama |
|
$ |
2,143 |
|
|
$ |
689 |
|
|
$ |
1,454 |
|
|
|
211.0 |
% |
Ben Sherman |
|
|
2,323 |
|
|
|
3,242 |
|
|
|
(919 |
) |
|
|
(28.3 |
%) |
Lanier Clothes |
|
|
5,243 |
|
|
|
4,482 |
|
|
|
761 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
% |
Oxford Apparel |
|
|
6,342 |
|
|
|
7,346 |
|
|
|
(1,004 |
) |
|
|
(13.7 |
%) |
Corporate and Other |
|
|
(4,943 |
) |
|
|
(2,875 |
) |
|
|
(2,068 |
) |
|
|
(71.9 |
%) |
|
Total operating income |
|
$ |
11,108 |
|
|
$ |
12,884 |
|
|
$ |
(1,776 |
) |
|
|
(13.8 |
%) |
|
Total LIFO accounting
and restructuring
charges included in
total operating
income |
|
$ |
1,288 |
|
|
$ |
601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income, on a consolidated basis, decreased to $11.1 million in the third quarter of
fiscal 2009 from $12.9 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2008. The $1.8 million decrease in
operating income was primarily due to the decreased net sales and royalty income, which was
partially offset by decreased SG&A. The third quarter of fiscal 2009 included a charge of $1.3
million related to LIFO accounting and the third quarter of fiscal 2008 included restructuring
charges of $0.6 million. Changes in operating income by operating group are discussed below.
Tommy Bahama:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
75,403 |
|
|
$ |
83,726 |
|
|
$ |
(8,323 |
) |
|
|
(9.9 |
%) |
Operating income |
|
|
2,143 |
|
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
1,454 |
|
|
|
211.0 |
% |
Operating income % of net sales |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges included
in operating income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in operating income for Tommy Bahama was primarily due to reduced SG&A partially offset by the reduction in net sales and decreased royalty income. The
reductions in SG&A were primarily due to decreased employment, advertising and other SG&A expenses.
Ben Sherman:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
29,844 |
|
|
$ |
38,235 |
|
|
$ |
(8,391 |
) |
|
|
(21.9 |
%) |
Operating income |
|
|
2,323 |
|
|
|
3,242 |
|
|
|
(919 |
) |
|
|
(28.3 |
%) |
Operating income % of net sales |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges included
in operating income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in operating income for Ben Sherman was primarily due to (1) lower sales and (2) the
unfavorable impact on cost of goods sold related to inventory purchases denominated in United
States dollars but sold in other currencies. These items were partially offset by overhead
reductions.
21
Lanier Clothes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
35,555 |
|
|
$ |
44,314 |
|
|
$ |
(8,759 |
) |
|
|
(19.8 |
%) |
Operating income |
|
|
5,243 |
|
|
|
4,482 |
|
|
|
761 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
% |
Operating income % of net sales |
|
|
14.7 |
% |
|
|
10.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges included
in operating income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in operating income for Lanier Clothes was primarily due to reduced SG&A and increased
gross margins, which partially offset the reduction in net sales.
Oxford Apparel:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
60,155 |
|
|
$ |
78,082 |
|
|
$ |
(17,927 |
) |
|
|
(23.0 |
%) |
Operating income |
|
|
6,342 |
|
|
|
7,346 |
|
|
|
(1,004 |
) |
|
|
(13.7 |
%) |
Operating income % of net sales |
|
|
10.5 |
% |
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges included
in operating income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The impact of the decreased sales which resulted in lower operating income for Oxford Apparel was
partially offset by reductions in SG&A. The reductions in SG&A in the third quarter of fiscal 2009
were attributable to reductions in restructuring charges, employment costs and variable operating
expenses.
Corporate and Other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
(4,943 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,875 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,068 |
) |
|
|
(71.9 |
%) |
LIFO accounting
charges included in
operating income
(loss) |
|
$ |
1,288 |
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporate and Other operating loss increased $2.1 million from a loss of $2.9 million in the
third quarter of fiscal 2008 to a loss of $4.9 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2009. The
third quarter of fiscal 2009 included a charge of $1.3 million related to LIFO accounting
adjustments.
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
$ |
5,302 |
|
|
$ |
6,437 |
|
|
$ |
(1,135 |
) |
|
|
(17.6 |
%) |
Write-off of
deferred financing
costs included in
interest expense |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in interest expense was primarily due to the write off of $0.9 million of unamortized
financing costs as a result of our amendment and restatement of our U.S. Revolving Credit Agreement
in the third quarter of fiscal 2008. Interest expense was also impacted by the various changes to
our financing arrangements during fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009 described above under the heading
Overview.
Income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
1,568 |
|
|
$ |
1,672 |
|
|
$ |
(104 |
) |
|
|
(6.2 |
%) |
Effective tax rate |
|
|
27.0 |
% |
|
|
25.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The rates for both periods reflect the favorable impact of permanent differences which do not
necessarily fluctuate with earnings and the impact of certain discrete items, including the
decrease in contingency reserves.
22
Net earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
Change |
|
% Change |
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
4,238 |
|
|
$ |
4,775 |
|
|
$ |
(537 |
) |
|
|
(11.2 |
%) |
Diluted net earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
(12.9 |
%) |
Weighted average common shares
outstanding-diluted |
|
|
15,965 |
|
|
|
15,581 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
The change in diluted net earnings per common share was primarily due to the sales declines
resulting from the challenging economic conditions, partially offset by the reductions in operating
expenses and the lower restructuring charges, each as discussed above.
FIRST NINE MONTHS OF FISCAL 2009 COMPARED TO FIRST NINE MONTHS OF FISCAL 2008
The following table sets forth the specified line items in our unaudited condensed consolidated
statements of operations both in dollars (in thousands) and as a percentage of net sales. The table
also sets forth the dollar change and the percentage change of the data as compared to the same
period of the prior year. We have calculated all percentages based on actual data, but percentage
columns may not add due to rounding. Individual line items of our consolidated statements of
operations may not be directly comparable to those of our competitors, as classification of certain
expenses may vary by company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Nine Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
610,156 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
747,648 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
(137,492 |
) |
|
|
(18.4 |
%) |
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
361,587 |
|
|
|
59.3 |
% |
|
|
441,039 |
|
|
|
59.0 |
% |
|
|
(79,452 |
) |
|
|
(18.0 |
%) |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
248,569 |
|
|
|
40.7 |
% |
|
|
306,609 |
|
|
|
41.0 |
% |
|
|
(58,040 |
) |
|
|
(18.9 |
%) |
SG&A |
|
|
224,746 |
|
|
|
36.8 |
% |
|
|
273,243 |
|
|
|
36.5 |
% |
|
|
(48,497 |
) |
|
|
(17.7 |
%) |
Amortization and impairment
of intangible assets |
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
5,538 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
(4,598 |
) |
|
|
(83.0 |
%) |
Royalties and other
operating income |
|
|
8,981 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
13,123 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
(4,142 |
) |
|
|
(31.6 |
%) |
|
Operating income |
|
|
31,864 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
40,951 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
(9,087 |
) |
|
|
(22.2 |
%) |
Interest expense, net |
|
|
16,112 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
18,754 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
(2,642 |
) |
|
|
(14.1 |
%) |
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
15,752 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
22,197 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
(6,445 |
) |
|
|
(29.0 |
%) |
Income taxes |
|
|
4,469 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
6,432 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
(1,963 |
) |
|
|
(30.5 |
%) |
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
11,283 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
$ |
15,765 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
$ |
(4,482 |
) |
|
|
(28.4 |
%) |
|
The discussion and tables below compare certain line items included in our consolidated statements
of operations for the first nine months of fiscal 2009 to the first nine months of fiscal 2008.
Each dollar and percentage change provided reflects the change between these periods unless
indicated otherwise. Each dollar and share amount included in the tables is in thousands except for
per share amounts.
Net sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Nine Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Tommy Bahama |
|
$ |
268,262 |
|
|
$ |
324,991 |
|
|
$ |
(56,729 |
) |
|
|
(17.5 |
%) |
Ben Sherman |
|
|
77,690 |
|
|
|
107,317 |
|
|
|
(29,627 |
) |
|
|
(27.6 |
%) |
Lanier Clothes |
|
|
92,266 |
|
|
|
111,185 |
|
|
|
(18,919 |
) |
|
|
(17.0 |
%) |
Oxford Apparel |
|
|
172,823 |
|
|
|
204,790 |
|
|
|
(31,967 |
) |
|
|
(15.6 |
%) |
Corporate and Other |
|
|
(885 |
) |
|
|
(635 |
) |
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
(39.4 |
%) |
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
610,156 |
|
|
$ |
747,648 |
|
|
$ |
(137,492 |
) |
|
|
(18.4 |
%) |
|
Net sales, on a consolidated basis, decreased $137.5 million, or 18.4%, in the first nine months of
fiscal 2009 compared to the first nine months of fiscal 2008 primarily as a result of the changes
in each operating group discussed below.
Tommy Bahama:
The decrease in net sales for Tommy Bahama was primarily due to a reduction in net sales at
wholesale and in our existing owned retail stores resulting from the challenging retail
environment. This decrease in wholesale sales and
existing store retail sales was partially offset by sales at our retail stores opened after the
beginning of fiscal 2008 and
23
increased e-commerce sales. Unit sales decreased 24.1% due primarily
to the challenging retail environment. The average selling price per unit increased by 7.5%, as
sales at our retail stores and our e-commerce sales, both of which have higher sales prices than
wholesale sales, represented a greater proportion of total Tommy Bahama sales.
Ben Sherman:
The decrease in net sales for Ben Sherman was primarily due to (1) a 19% reduction in the average
exchange rate of the British pound sterling versus the United States dollar during the first nine
months of fiscal 2009 compared to the average exchange rate during the first nine months of fiscal
2008, (2) the impact of the challenging economic environment on wholesale shipments and (3) our
exit from and subsequent licensing of our footwear and kids operations. During the first nine
months of fiscal 2009, unit sales for Ben Sherman declined by 18.5% due primarily to the
challenging economic conditions. The average selling price per unit decreased 11.1%, resulting
primarily from the impact of the weaker British pound sterling, which was partially offset by a
larger percentage of total Ben Sherman sales being sales at our retail stores, which generally have
a higher sales price than wholesale sales.
Lanier Clothes:
The decrease in net sales for Lanier Clothes was primarily due to (1) our exit from the Oscar de la
Renta and Nautica licensed businesses, with fiscal 2009 sales primarily consisting of close out
sales, (2) the restructuring of the Arnold Brant business in fiscal 2008 and (3) the challenging
economic conditions. These factors resulted in a decrease in unit sales of 5.5% and a decrease in
the average selling price per unit of 12.2%.
Oxford Apparel:
The decrease in net sales for Oxford Apparel was generally anticipated in connection with our
strategy to focus on key product categories and exit underperforming lines of business, but was
also impacted by the difficult economic conditions. Unit sales decreased by 16.7% as a result of
our exit from certain lines of business and the challenging economic conditions, and the average
selling price per unit increased by 1.3% due to changes in product mix.
Gross Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Nine Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
248,569 |
|
|
$ |
306,609 |
|
|
$ |
(58,040 |
) |
|
|
(18.9 |
%) |
Gross profit % of net sales |
|
|
40.7 |
% |
|
|
41.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIFO accounting
charges/(credits) and
restructuring charges
included in cost of goods
sold |
|
$ |
5,773 |
|
|
$ |
2,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in gross profit was primarily due to lower sales in each operating group, as described
above. Gross margins decreased to 40.7% of net sales during the first nine months of fiscal 2009
from 41.0% in the first nine months of fiscal 2008. Ben Shermans gross margins were negatively
impacted by increased cost of goods sold related to inventory purchases denominated in United
States dollars but sold in other currencies. The first nine months of fiscal 2009 included LIFO
accounting charges of $5.8 million, while the first nine months of fiscal 2008 included
restructuring charges of $5.3 million primarily related to our exit from the Oscar de la Renta and
Nautica licensed businesses and a LIFO accounting credit of $2.8 million. Gross margins were also
impacted by the sales mix between our retail operations and wholesale operations, with retail
sales, which generally have higher gross margins, representing a higher proportion of our net sales
during the first nine months of fiscal 2009. Our gross profit may not be directly comparable to
those of our competitors, as statement of operations classification of certain expenses may vary by
company.
SG&A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Nine Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
SG&A |
|
$ |
224,746 |
|
|
$ |
273,243 |
|
|
$ |
(48,497 |
) |
|
|
(17.7 |
%) |
SG&A % of net sales |
|
|
36.8 |
% |
|
|
36.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring and other charges included in SG&A |
|
$ |
1,362 |
|
|
$ |
2,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in SG&A was primarily due to (1) significant reductions in our headcount and other
overhead costs, (2) cost reductions associated with our exit from certain businesses, (3) the
impact on Ben Sherman of a 19% reduction in the average value of the British pound sterling versus
the United States dollar, (4) reductions in store opening costs resulting from reduced retail store
openings and (5) reductions in advertising expenses. Additionally, the first nine months of fiscal
2008 included restructuring charges and other unusual items totaling a net charge of approximately
$2.2 million. The cost savings were partially offset by expenses associated with the operation of
additional retail stores
which opened subsequent to the beginning of fiscal 2008 and $1.4 million of restructuring charges
during the
24
first nine months of fiscal 2009 primarily associated with our exit from, and subsequent
licensing of, the Ben Sherman footwear and kids operations as well as other streamlining
initiatives in fiscal 2009.
Amortization and impairment of intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Nine Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Amortization and impairment of intangible assets |
|
$ |
940 |
|
|
$ |
5,538 |
|
|
$ |
(4,598 |
) |
|
|
(83.0 |
%) |
Impairment charges included in amortization and
impairment of intangible assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in amortization and impairment of intangible assets was primarily due to the $3.3
million of impairment charges related to the Arnold Brant and Solitude intangible assets in Lanier
Clothes and Oxford Apparel, respectively, in the first nine months of fiscal 2008. The decrease was
also partially the result of amortization typically being greater in the earlier periods following
an acquisition. Amortization of intangible assets is expected to be approximately $1.2 million in
fiscal 2009, including the $0.9 million recognized in the first nine months of fiscal 2009.
Royalties and other operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Nine Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Royalties and other operating income |
|
$ |
8,981 |
|
|
$ |
13,123 |
|
|
$ |
(4,142 |
) |
|
|
(31.6 |
%) |
Unusual charges/(credits) included
in royalties and other operating
income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(220 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in royalties and other operating income was primarily due to the termination of the
license agreement for footwear in Tommy Bahama, the challenging economic conditions and the 19%
decline in the average value of the British pound sterling versus the United States dollar, which
impacted Ben Sherman royalty income. The first nine months of fiscal 2008 also included a net gain
on (1) the sale of a trademark and (2) the impairment of a joint venture by Oxford Apparel of
approximately $0.2 million.
Operating Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Nine Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Tommy Bahama |
|
$ |
27,772 |
|
|
$ |
38,315 |
|
|
$ |
(10,543 |
) |
|
|
(27.5 |
%) |
Ben Sherman |
|
|
(5,961 |
) |
|
|
1,495 |
|
|
|
(7,456 |
) |
|
|
(498.7 |
%) |
Lanier Clothes |
|
|
10,681 |
|
|
|
(6,894 |
) |
|
|
17,575 |
|
|
|
254.9 |
% |
Oxford Apparel |
|
|
15,664 |
|
|
|
16,409 |
|
|
|
(745 |
) |
|
|
(4.5 |
%) |
Corporate and Other |
|
|
(16,292 |
) |
|
|
(8,374 |
) |
|
|
(7,918 |
) |
|
|
(94.6 |
%) |
|
Total operating income |
|
$ |
31,864 |
|
|
$ |
40,951 |
|
|
$ |
(9,087 |
) |
|
|
(22.2 |
%) |
|
Total restructuring
and other unusual
charges included in
total operating
income |
|
$ |
7,135 |
|
|
$ |
7,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income, on a consolidated basis, decreased $9.1 million to $31.9 million in the first
nine months of fiscal 2009. The decrease in operating income was primarily due to the decreased
sales and royalty income, which were partially offset by decreased SG&A and lower restructuring
charges, as discussed above. The first nine months of fiscal 2009 included LIFO accounting charges
of approximately $5.8 million and restructuring charges of approximately $1.4 million. The first
nine months of fiscal 2008 included restructuring charges and other unusual items of approximately
$10.5 million partially offset by LIFO accounting credits of approximately $2.8 million. Changes
in operating income by operating group are discussed below.
Tommy Bahama:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Nine Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
268,262 |
|
|
$ |
324,991 |
|
|
$ |
(56,729 |
) |
|
|
(17.5 |
%) |
Operating income |
|
|
27,772 |
|
|
|
38,315 |
|
|
|
(10,543 |
) |
|
|
(27.5 |
%) |
Operating income % of net sales |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
11.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring costs in operating income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
The decrease in operating income for Tommy Bahama was primarily due to the reduction in sales and
decreased royalty income, as discussed above. These items were partially offset by (1) decreased
employment, advertising, store pre-opening and other variable operating costs and (2) higher gross
margins as retail sales represented a greater proportion of total Tommy Bahama sales.
Ben Sherman:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Nine Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
77,690 |
|
|
$ |
107,317 |
|
|
$ |
(29,627 |
) |
|
|
(27.6 |
%) |
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(5,961 |
) |
|
|
1,495 |
|
|
|
(7,456 |
) |
|
|
(498.7 |
%) |
Operating income (loss) % of net sales |
|
|
(7.7 |
%) |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring costs in operating income |
|
$ |
1,362 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decline in operating results for Ben Sherman was primarily due to (1) lower sales, (2) the
unfavorable impact on inventory purchases denominated in United States dollars but sold in other
currencies, (3) lower royalty income and (4) $1.4 million of restructuring charges primarily
related to the exit from, and subsequent licensing of, the Ben Sherman footwear and kids
operations as well as other streamlining initiatives. These items were partially offset by
headcount and other overhead reductions.
Lanier Clothes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Nine Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
92,266 |
|
|
$ |
111,185 |
|
|
$ |
(18,919 |
) |
|
|
(17.0 |
%) |
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
10,681 |
|
|
|
(6,894 |
) |
|
|
17,575 |
|
|
|
254.9 |
% |
Operating income (loss) % of net sales |
|
|
11.6 |
% |
|
|
(6.2 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring and other unusual
charges included in operating income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The first nine months of fiscal 2008 for Lanier Clothes included $9.6 million of restructuring and
impairment charges associated with (1) our exit from the Nautica and Oscar de la Renta licensed
businesses, (2) restructuring of our Arnold Brant business and (3) certain other unusual items.
Aside from the restructuring and impairment charges in fiscal 2008, improved gross margins and
reductions in headcount and other overhead costs contributed to the improved operating results.
Oxford Apparel:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Nine Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
172,823 |
|
|
$ |
204,790 |
|
|
$ |
(31,967 |
) |
|
|
(15.6 |
%) |
Operating income |
|
|
15,664 |
|
|
|
16,409 |
|
|
|
(745 |
) |
|
|
(4.5 |
%) |
Operating income % of net sales |
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring and other
unusual charges included in
operating income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The impact of the decreased sales for Oxford Apparel in the first nine months of fiscal 2009,
discussed above, was partially offset by reductions in SG&A. The reductions in SG&A in the first
nine months of fiscal 2009 were attributable to reductions in headcount and other overhead costs.
The first nine months of fiscal 2008 included a net charge of $0.6 million related to (1) an
impairment charge for the Solitude intangible assets, (2) certain inventory disposal costs
associated with exiting the Solitude business, (3) the resolution of a contingent liability, (4) a
gain on the sale of a trademark and (5) the impairment of a joint venture.
Corporate and Other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Nine Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
(16,292 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,374 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,918 |
) |
|
|
(94.6 |
%) |
LIFO accounting
charges/(credits) and
restructuring charges
included in operating
income (loss) |
|
$ |
5,773 |
|
|
$ |
(2,726 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
The first nine months of fiscal 2009 for Corporate and Other included a charge of $5.8 million
related to LIFO accounting compared to a credit of $2.8 million in the first nine months of fiscal
2008. The impact of LIFO accounting was partially offset by reductions in SG&A.
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Nine Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
$ |
16,112 |
|
|
$ |
18,754 |
|
|
$ |
(2,642 |
) |
|
|
(14.1 |
%) |
Write-off of
deferred financing
costs included in
interest expense |
|
$ |
1,759 |
|
|
$ |
900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in interest expense, net was primarily due to lower debt levels resulting from (1)
strong cash flow from operations during the twelve months ended October 31, 2009 and (2) the
repurchase of certain of our 8 7/8% Senior Unsecured Notes in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008.
Also, the first nine months of fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008 included charges of $1.8 million and
$0.9 million, respectively, related to the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs as a
result of certain changes to our financing arrangements in each period.
Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Nine Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
4,469 |
|
|
$ |
6,432 |
|
|
$ |
(1,963 |
) |
|
|
(30.5 |
%) |
Effective tax rate |
|
|
28.4 |
% |
|
|
29.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The rates for both periods reflect the favorable impact of permanent differences which do not
necessarily fluctuate with earnings, and the impact of certain discrete items, including the
decrease in contingency reserves.
Net earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Nine Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
Change |
|
% Change |
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
11,283 |
|
|
$ |
15,765 |
|
|
$ |
(4,482 |
) |
|
|
(28.4 |
%) |
Diluted net earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
(0.28 |
) |
|
|
(28.0 |
%) |
Weighted average common shares
outstanding-diluted |
|
|
15,729 |
|
|
|
15,773 |
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
%) |
The change in net earnings was primarily due to the sales declines and lower royalty income,
partially offset by the reductions in SG&A and interest expense, each as discussed above.
FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our primary source of revenue and cash flow is our operating activities in the United States and,
to a lesser extent, the United Kingdom. When cash inflows are less than cash outflows, subject to
their terms, we also have access to amounts under our U.S. Revolving Credit Agreement and U.K.
Revolving Credit Agreement, each of which is described below. We may seek to finance future capital
investment programs through various methods, including, but not limited to, cash flow from
operations, borrowings under our current or additional credit facilities and sales of debt or
equity securities.
Our liquidity requirements arise from the funding of our working capital needs, which include
inventory and accounts receivable, other operating expenses, funding of capital expenditures,
payment of quarterly dividends, periodic interest payments related to our financing arrangements
and repayment of our indebtedness. Our product purchases are often facilitated by trade letters of
credit which are drawn against our lines of credit at the time of shipment of the products and
reduce the amounts available under our lines of credit when issued.
Key Liquidity Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
October 31, 2009 |
|
January 31, 2009 |
|
November 1, 2008 |
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
204,081 |
|
|
$ |
228,289 |
|
|
$ |
257,736 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
103,759 |
|
|
|
106,833 |
|
|
|
120,252 |
|
|
Working capital |
|
$ |
100,322 |
|
|
$ |
121,456 |
|
|
$ |
137,484 |
|
|
Working capital ratio |
|
|
1.97 |
|
|
|
2.14 |
|
|
|
2.14 |
|
Debt to total capital ratio |
|
|
62 |
% |
|
|
68 |
% |
|
|
38 |
% |
27
Our working capital ratio is calculated by dividing total current assets by total current
liabilities. The decrease was primarily due to reductions in our inventory and accounts receivable
levels, which were greater than the reductions in current liabilities. For the ratio of debt to
total capital, debt is defined as short-term and long-term debt, and total capital is defined as
debt plus shareholders equity. The change in this ratio from November 1, 2008 to October 31, 2009
is primarily a result of impairment of certain goodwill and intangible assets during fiscal 2008
which reduced shareholders equity significantly. Our debt levels and ratio of debt to
total-capital in future periods may not be comparable to historical amounts due to the changes to
our credit facilities and other debt instruments since the beginning of the third quarter of fiscal
2008, and as we continue to assess and periodically make changes to our capital structure. Changes
in our capital structure, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity
requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors.
The Balance Sheet
The following tables set forth certain information included in our condensed consolidated balance
sheets (in thousands). Below each table are explanations for any significant changes in the
balances from November 1, 2008 to October 31, 2009.
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2009 |
|
November 1, 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
5,995 |
|
|
$ |
8,034 |
|
|
$ |
(2,039 |
) |
|
|
(25.4 |
%) |
Receivables, net |
|
|
94,503 |
|
|
|
119,960 |
|
|
|
(25,457 |
) |
|
|
(21.2 |
%) |
Inventories, net |
|
|
83,675 |
|
|
|
108,622 |
|
|
|
(24,947 |
) |
|
|
(23.0 |
%) |
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
19,908 |
|
|
|
21,120 |
|
|
|
(1,212 |
) |
|
|
(5.7 |
%) |
|
Total current assets |
|
$ |
204,081 |
|
|
$ |
257,736 |
|
|
$ |
(53,655 |
) |
|
|
(20.8 |
%) |
|
The decrease in receivables was primarily due to lower wholesale sales in the last two months of
the third quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to the last two months of the third quarter of fiscal
2008. Inventory levels at Ben Sherman, Lanier Clothes and Oxford Apparel have each decreased as we
have focused on mitigating inventory markdown risk and promotional pressure and have exited certain
lines of business. Inventory levels at Tommy Bahama increased slightly in order to support the
additional retail stores we were operating at October 31, 2009. The decrease in prepaid expenses
was primarily due to the timing of payment of certain expenses.
Non-current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2009 |
|
November 1, 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
$ |
83,769 |
|
|
$ |
93,348 |
|
|
$ |
(9,579 |
) |
|
|
(10.3 |
%) |
Goodwill, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
248,569 |
|
|
|
(248,569 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
%) |
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
138,409 |
|
|
|
208,315 |
|
|
|
(69,906 |
) |
|
|
(33.6 |
%) |
Other non-current assets, net |
|
|
23,741 |
|
|
|
26,928 |
|
|
|
(3,187 |
) |
|
|
(11.8 |
%) |
|
Total non-current assets, net |
|
$ |
245,919 |
|
|
$ |
577,160 |
|
|
$ |
(331,241 |
) |
|
|
(57.4 |
%) |
|
The decrease in property, plant and equipment, net was primarily due to depreciation expense
exceeding capital expenditures during the twelve months ended October 31, 2009 as well as the
impact of certain asset impairments in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. The decreases in
goodwill, net and intangible assets, net were primarily due to the impact of impairments recognized
in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. The decrease in other non-current assets, net was primarily
due to (1) impairment of investments in joint ventures in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 and (2)
the write-off and amortization of certain deferred financing costs. These items were partially
offset by the payment of certain deferred financing costs associated with the offering of our 11
3/8% Senior Secured Notes in June 2009.
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2009 |
|
November 1, 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
103,759 |
|
|
$ |
120,252 |
|
|
$ |
(16,493 |
) |
|
|
(13.7 |
%) |
Long-term debt less current maturities |
|
|
161,244 |
|
|
|
219,548 |
|
|
|
(58,304 |
) |
|
|
(26.6 |
%) |
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
47,432 |
|
|
|
50,562 |
|
|
|
(3,130 |
) |
|
|
(6.2 |
%) |
Non-current deferred income taxes |
|
|
29,444 |
|
|
|
54,416 |
|
|
|
(24,972 |
) |
|
|
(45.9 |
%) |
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
341,879 |
|
|
$ |
444,778 |
|
|
$ |
(102,899 |
) |
|
|
(23.1 |
%) |
|
The decrease in total current liabilities was primarily due to reductions in accruals related to
inventory, employment and other overhead costs, and interest payable. The decrease in long-term
debt is primarily due to cash flow from operating activities resulting from lower working capital
positions subsequent to November 1, 2008, which exceeded
cash requirements for investing and financing activities and the repurchase of certain of our 8
7/8% Senior Unsecured
28
Notes at a discount in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. The decrease in
other non-current liabilities was primarily due to the declines in deferred rent and deferred
compensation liabilities. The change in non-current deferred income taxes primarily resulted from
(1) the impact of the impairment and amortization of certain intangible assets recognized in the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, (2) the change in foreign currency exchange rates subsequent to
November 1, 2008 and (3) changes in taxes accrued on undistributed foreign earnings.
The Statement of Cash Flows
The following table sets forth the major line items of our condensed consolidated statements of
cash flows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Nine Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
41,988 |
|
|
$ |
61,286 |
|
|
$ |
(19,298 |
) |
|
|
(31.5 |
%) |
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(8,419 |
) |
|
|
(17,930 |
) |
|
|
9,511 |
|
|
|
53.0 |
% |
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(31,007 |
) |
|
|
(49,480 |
) |
|
|
18,473 |
|
|
|
37.3 |
% |
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,562 |
|
|
$ |
(6,124 |
) |
|
$ |
8,686 |
|
|
|
141.8 |
% |
Effect of foreign currency translation on cash
and cash equivalents |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
(754 |
) |
|
|
897 |
|
|
|
119.0 |
% |
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the
year |
|
|
3,290 |
|
|
|
14,912 |
|
|
|
(11,622 |
) |
|
|
(77.9 |
%) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period |
|
$ |
5,995 |
|
|
$ |
8,034 |
|
|
$ |
(2,039 |
) |
|
|
(25.4 |
%) |
|
Operating Activities:
The operating cash flows for the first nine months of fiscal 2009 and the first nine months of
fiscal 2008 were primarily the result of earnings for the period, adjusted for non-cash activities
such as depreciation, amortization and stock compensation expense as well as changes in our working
capital accounts. In the first nine months of fiscal 2009, the significant changes in working
capital from January 31, 2009 were a decrease in inventories partially offset by an increase in
accounts receivable and a decrease in current liabilities. In the first nine months of fiscal 2008,
the significant changes in working capital from February 2, 2008 were a decrease in inventories
partially offset by an increase in accounts receivable and a decrease in current liabilities.
Investing Activities:
During the first nine months of fiscal 2009 and the first nine months of fiscal 2008, investing
activities used $8.4 million and $17.9 million, respectively, of cash. These investing activities
primarily consisted of capital expenditures related to new retail stores and costs associated with
our ongoing implementation of a new integrated financial system.
Financing Activities:
During the first nine months of fiscal 2009, financing activities used $31.0 million of cash. Cash
flow from operations, borrowings under our U.S. Revolving Credit Agreement and the proceeds from
the issuance of $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of 11 3/8% Senior Secured Notes were used
to repurchase $166.8 million aggregate principal amount of our 8 7/8% Senior Unsecured Notes, to
pay $4.4 million of dividends for the first, second and third quarters of fiscal 2009 and to pay
$5.0 million of financing costs associated with our 11 3/8% Senior Secured Notes issued in June
2009. During the first nine months of fiscal 2008, financing activities used $49.5 million of cash.
Cash flow from operations was used to repay amounts outstanding under our credit facilities during
the first nine months of fiscal 2008. Additionally, $11.6 million of dividends were paid during the
first nine months of fiscal 2008. These dividend payments include payments for the quarter ended
February 2, 2008 and the first, second and third quarters of fiscal 2008.
29
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The table below provides a description of our significant financing arrangements and the amounts
outstanding under these financing arrangements (in thousands) as of October 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
$175 million U.S. Secured Revolving Credit Facility (U.S.
Revolving Credit Agreement), which is limited to a borrowing
base consisting of specified percentages of eligible categories
of assets, accrues interest (2.08% at August 1, 2009), unused
line fees and letter of credit fees based upon a pricing grid
which is tied to average unused availability, requires interest
payments monthly with principal due at maturity (August 2013)
and is secured by a first priority security interest in the
accounts receivable (other than royalty payments in respect of
trademark licenses), inventory, investment property (including
the equity interests of certain subsidiaries), general
intangibles (other than trademarks, trade names and related
rights), deposit accounts, intercompany obligations, equipment,
goods, documents, contracts, books and records and other
personal property of Oxford Industries, Inc. and substantially
all of its domestic subsidiaries and a second priority interest
in those assets in which the holders of the 11 3/8% Senior
Secured Notes have a first priority interest (1) |
|
$ |
26,821 |
|
£12 million Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility (U.K.
Revolving Credit Agreement), which accrues interest at the
banks base rate plus 1.35% (1.85% at October 31, 2009),
requires interest payments monthly with principal payable on
demand and is collateralized by substantially all of the United
Kingdom assets of Ben Sherman |
|
|
5,658 |
|
11.375% Senior Secured Notes (11 3/8% Senior Secured Notes),
which accrue interest at an annual rate of 11.375% (effective
interest rate of 12%) and require interest payments
semi-annually in January and July of each year, require payment
of principal at maturity (July 2015), are subject to certain
prepayment penalties, are secured by a first priority interest
in all U.S. registered trademarks and certain related rights
and certain future acquired real property owned in fee simple
of Oxford Industries, Inc. and substantially all of its
consolidated domestic subsidiaries and a second priority
interest in those assets in which the lenders under the U.S.
Revolving Credit Agreement have a first priority interest, and
are guaranteed by certain of our domestic subsidiaries (2) |
|
|
150,000 |
|
Unamortized discount (2) |
|
|
(3,756 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
$ |
178,723 |
|
Short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
(17,479 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current maturities |
|
$ |
161,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
$15.0 million of the $26.8 million outstanding under the U.S. Revolving Credit
Agreement at October 31, 2009 was classified as long-term debt as this amount represents
the minimum amount we anticipate to be outstanding under the U.S. Revolving Credit
Agreement during fiscal 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
In June 2009, we issued the 11 3/8% Senior Secured Notes at 97.353% of the $150 million
principal amount, resulting in gross proceeds of $146.0 million. Proceeds from the 11 3/8%
Senior Secured Notes and borrowings under our U.S. Revolving Credit Agreement were used to
fund the satisfaction and discharge of the 8 7/8% Senior Unsecured Notes outstanding at
that time. |
Our credit facilities are used to finance trade letters of credit, as well to provide funding for
other operating activities, capital expenditures and acquisitions. As of October 31, 2009,
approximately $17.1 million of trade letters of credit and other limitations on availability in the
aggregate were outstanding against the U.S. Revolving Credit Agreement and the U.K. Revolving
Credit Agreement. On October 31, 2009, we had approximately $105 million and $11 million in unused
availability under the U.S. Revolving Credit Agreement and the U.K. Revolving Credit Agreement,
respectively, subject to the respective limitations on borrowings set forth in the U.S. Revolving
Credit Agreement, U.K. Revolving Credit Agreement and the indenture for the 11 3/8% Senior Secured
Notes.
Covenants, Other Restrictions and Prepayment Penalties:
Our credit facilities and 11 3/8% Senior Secured Notes are subject to a number of affirmative
covenants regarding the delivery of financial information, compliance with law, maintenance of
property, insurance and conduct of business. Also, our credit facilities and 11 3/8% Senior Secured
Notes are subject to certain negative covenants or other restrictions including, among other
things, limitations on our ability to (i) incur debt, (ii) guaranty certain obligations, (iii)
incur liens, (iv) pay dividends to shareholders, (v) repurchase shares of our common stock, (vi)
make investments, (vii) sell assets or stock of subsidiaries, (viii) acquire assets or businesses,
(ix) merge or consolidate with other companies, or (x) prepay, retire, repurchase or redeem debt.
30
Pursuant to the indenture governing our 11 3/8% Senior Secured Notes, our ability to incur certain
indebtedness or to make certain restricted payments, as defined in the indenture, is subject to our
meeting certain conditions, including in
each case the condition that our fixed charge coverage ratio, as defined in the indenture, not be
less than 2.0 to 1.0 for the preceding four fiscal quarters on a pro forma basis after giving
effect to the proposed indebtedness or restricted payment and, in the case of a restricted payment,
the condition that the aggregate total of all restricted payments not exceed a certain allowable
amount calculated pursuant to a formula set forth in the indenture. Restricted payments under the
indenture include, without limitation, cash dividends to shareholders, repurchases of our capital
stock, and certain investments.
Additionally, the U.S. Revolving Credit Agreement contains a financial covenant that applies only
if unused availability under the U.S. Revolving Credit Agreement is less than the greater of (i)
$26.25 million or (ii) 15% of the total revolving commitments for three consecutive business days.
In such case, our fixed charge coverage ratio as defined in the U.S. Revolving Credit Agreement
must not be less than 1.0 to 1.0 for the immediately preceding 12 fiscal months for which financial
statements have been delivered. This financial covenant continues to apply until we have
maintained unused availability under the U.S. Revolving Credit Agreement of more than the greater
of (i) $26.25 million or (ii) 15% of the total revolving commitments for thirty consecutive days.
We believe that the affirmative covenants, negative covenants, financial covenants and other
restrictions are customary for those included in similar facilities and notes. As of October 31,
2009, no financial covenant testing was required pursuant to our U.S. Revolving Credit Agreement as
the minimum availability threshold was met during the quarter. As of October 31, 2009, we were
compliant with all covenants related to our credit facilities and 11 3/8% Senior Secured Notes.
At any time prior to July 15, 2012, we may redeem all or a portion of the 11 3/8% Senior Secured
Notes, on not less than 30 nor more than 60 days prior notice, in amounts of $2,000 or an integral
multiple of $1,000 in excess thereof, at a price equal to the greater of (i) 100% of the aggregate
principal amount of the 11 3/8% Senior Secured Notes to be redeemed, together with accrued and
unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption and (ii) as determined by an independent
investment banker (as prescribed under the indenture), the sum of the present values of 105.688% of
the principal amount of the 11 3/8% Senior Secured Notes being redeemed plus scheduled payments of
interest (not including any portion of such payments of interest accrued as of the date of
redemption) from the date of redemption to July 15, 2012 discounted to the redemption date on a
semiannual basis (assuming a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months) at the Adjusted
Treasury Rate (as defined in the indenture) plus 50 basis points, together with accrued and unpaid
interest, if any, to the date of redemption.
On or after July 15, 2012, we may redeem all or a portion of the 11 3/8% Senior Secured Notes, on
not less than 30 nor more than 60 days prior notice, in amounts of $2,000 or an integral multiple
of $1,000 in excess thereof at the following redemption prices (expressed as percentages of the
principal amount), together with accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date, if
redeemed during the 12-month period beginning July 15 of the years indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
105.688 |
% |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
102.844 |
% |
|
|
2014 and thereafter |
|
|
100.000 |
% |
Other Liquidity Items:
We anticipate that we will be able to satisfy our ongoing cash requirements, which generally
consist of working capital needs, capital expenditures (primarily for the opening of additional
retail stores and the implementation of a new integrated financial system) and interest payments on
our debt during fiscal 2009, primarily from positive cash flow from operations supplemented by
borrowings under our lines of credit, if necessary. Our need for working capital is typically
seasonal with the greatest requirements generally existing in the fall and spring of each year. Our
capital needs will depend on many factors including our growth rate, the need to finance inventory
levels and the success of our various products. At maturity of the U.S. Revolving Credit Agreement
and the 11 3/8% Senior Secured Notes or if the U.K. Revolving Credit Agreement was required to be
paid, we anticipate that we will be able to refinance the facilities and debt with terms available
in the market at that time, which may or may not be as favorable as the terms of the current
agreements.
31
Our contractual obligations as of October 31, 2009 have not changed significantly from the
contractual obligations outstanding at January 31, 2009 other than (1) changes in the amounts
outstanding under our U.S. Revolving Credit Agreement, (2) changes in the amounts outstanding under
our U.K. Revolving Credit Agreement, (3) changes in
amounts outstanding pursuant to letters of credit, (4) the issuance of the 11 3/8% Senior Secured
Notes due July 2015 and (5) the repayment and satisfaction of all obligations related to the 8 7/8%
Senior Unsecured Notes due June 2011 (each as discussed above). The 11 3/8% Senior Secured Notes
require interest payments of $8.5 million each January and July through their maturity in July
2015.
Our anticipated capital expenditures for fiscal 2009, including $8.4 million incurred during the
first nine months of fiscal 2009, are expected to be approximately $10 million. These expenditures
consist primarily of additional Tommy Bahama and Ben Sherman retail stores and the costs associated
with the implementation of a new integrated financial system.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have not entered into agreements which meet the SECs definition of an off balance sheet
financing arrangement, other than operating leases, and have made no financial commitments to or
guarantees with respect to any unconsolidated subsidiaries or special purpose entities.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments
that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses and related
disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates,
including those related to bad debts, inventories, intangible assets, income taxes, stock
compensation expense, contingencies and litigation and certain other accrued expenses. We base our
estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about
the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Our
critical accounting policies and estimates are discussed in Part II, Item 7, Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for fiscal 2008. There have not been any significant changes to the application of our
critical accounting policies and estimates during the first nine months of fiscal 2009, except that
we no longer have any goodwill recognized in our balance sheet after the impairment charge which
was recognized in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008.
A detailed summary of significant accounting policies is included in Note 1 to our consolidated
financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2008.
SEASONALITY
Although our various product lines are sold on a year-round basis, the demand for specific products
or styles may be seasonal. For example, the demand for Tommy Bahama and golf products is higher in
the spring and summer seasons. Generally, our wholesale products are sold prior to each of the
retail selling seasons, consisting of spring, summer, fall and holiday. As the timing of product
shipments and other events affecting the retail business may vary, results for any particular
quarter may not be indicative of results for the full year. The percentage of net sales by quarter
(unaudited) for fiscal 2008 was 29%, 24%, 26% and 21%, respectively, and the percentage of earnings
(loss) before income taxes by quarter (unaudited) for fiscal 2008 was 5%, 1%, 2% and (108%),
respectively. We do not believe the fiscal 2008 distribution of earnings (loss) before income taxes
is indicative of the distribution in future years, in particular because certain of the quarters in
fiscal 2008 were impacted to varying degrees by restructuring charges, asset impairment charges,
other unusual items, a gain on the repurchase of a portion of our 8 7/8% Senior Unsecured Notes and
the challenging economic environment.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to certain trade policy, interest rate, foreign currency, commodity and inflation
risks as discussed in Part II, Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2008. There have not been any significant changes in
our exposure to these risks during fiscal 2009.
32
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of
the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this
report. Based upon that evaluation, our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in our
Securities Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2009, we converted certain of our financial systems in our
United States operations (general ledger, payables and fixed assets) to a new integrated financial
system. As a result of these conversions, certain controls were modified, as necessary, to
supplement and complement our existing internal controls over financial reporting. We anticipate
converting other of our financial systems and certain other geographic regions to the new
integrated financial system in future periods. The conversion of certain of our financial systems
to an integrated financial system was undertaken to provide a more integrated financial system
across our operating groups, more timely management information, efficiencies in our operations and
enhanced customer service, and not in response to any actual or perceived deficiencies in our
internal control over financial reporting.
Except for the conversion of certain of our financial systems to a new integrated financial system
as discussed above, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such
term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act) that occurred
during the third quarter of fiscal 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In the ordinary course of business, we may become subject to litigation or claims. We are not
currently a party to any litigation or regulatory action that we believe could reasonably be
expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
We believe that an investor should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part II, Item 1A,
Risk Factors in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter of fiscal 2009, which are
not the only risks facing our company. We do not believe there have been any material changes to
the risk factors described in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter of fiscal
2009. If any of the risks described in such Quarterly Report, or other risks or uncertainties not
currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial, actually occur, our business,
financial condition or operating results could suffer.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
|
(a) |
|
During the third quarter of fiscal 2009, we did not make any unregistered sales of our
equity securities. |
|
|
(c) |
|
We have certain stock incentive plans as described in Note 7 to our consolidated
financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2008, all of
which are publicly announced plans. Under the plans, we can repurchase shares from
employees to cover employee tax liabilities related to the exercise of stock options or the
vesting of previously restricted shares. No shares were purchased during the third quarter
of fiscal 2009. |
On September 8, 2008, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase by us of up to 0.5 million
shares of our common stock. As of October 31, 2009, no shares had been repurchased pursuant to this
authorization, which has no automatic expiration.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None
33
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
3.1 |
|
Restated Articles of Incorporation of Oxford Industries, Inc. Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 29, 2003. |
|
|
3.2 |
|
Bylaws of Oxford Industries, Inc., as amended. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1
to the Companys Form 8-K filed on June 17, 2009. |
|
|
31.1 |
|
Section 302 Certification by Principal Executive Officer.* |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Section 302 Certification by Principal Financial Officer.* |
|
|
32 |
|
Section 906 Certification by Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer.* |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
December 10, 2009 |
OXFORD INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
/s/ K. Scott Grassmyer
|
|
|
K. Scott Grassmyer |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller
(Authorized Signatory and Principal Financial Officer) |
|
34
exv31w1
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, J. Hicks Lanier, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Oxford Industries, Inc.; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: December 10, 2009 |
/s/ J. Hicks Lanier
|
|
|
J. Hicks Lanier |
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
exv31w2
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, K. Scott Grassmyer, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Oxford Industries, Inc.; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: December 10, 2009 |
/s/ K. Scott Grassmyer
|
|
|
K. Scott Grassmyer |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
exv32
Exhibit 32
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oxford Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
(Form 10-Q) for the quarter ended October 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, J. Hicks Lanier, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and I, K. Scott Grassmyer, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller
of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
(1) |
|
The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|
(2) |
|
The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. |
|
|
|
/s/ J. Hicks Lanier |
|
|
|
|
|
J. Hicks Lanier |
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
December 10, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ K. Scott Grassmyer |
|
|
|
|
|
K. Scott Grassmyer |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller |
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
December 10, 2009 |
|
|